<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A free and open market in credibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277057</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277057</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Frank.  There's no question that blurring the line between editorial and advertising is something that has been going on since print was invented.

What I find interesting (and different) about the phenomenon when it comes to blogs is that it is a personal brand or credibility that is at stake, rather than one that adheres to an institution or media outlet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Frank.  There&#8217;s no question that blurring the line between editorial and advertising is something that has been going on since print was invented.</p>
<p>What I find interesting (and different) about the phenomenon when it comes to blogs is that it is a personal brand or credibility that is at stake, rather than one that adheres to an institution or media outlet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277017</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277017</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful post.  You are absolutely right about trust being the central issue; but I still struggle in this case to see any transparency or trust challenges. Saw this article in the NYT today about a slightly similar issue in the magazine world:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html

Here is the relevant piece:
But Wine Spectator — which describes one South African cabernet in the current issue as having notes of “grilled beef, charcoal, hot tar and truffle” — had to be won over. “At first they said, ‘It’s not for sale,’ ” Mr. Halme said. “They thought it might compromise editorial or clutter the page.”

But a statement from Dentsu boasts that the ads “look as if they are integrated into editorial.”

“It’s interesting that they’re bragging about having pulled a fast one,” said Roy Peter Clark, vice president of the Poynter Institute, a journalism school. “Instead of being transparent about the separation between editorial and advertising content, there is an attempt to blur distinctions.”

Food (or wine) for thought?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful post.  You are absolutely right about trust being the central issue; but I still struggle in this case to see any transparency or trust challenges. Saw this article in the NYT today about a slightly similar issue in the magazine world:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html</a></p>
<p>Here is the relevant piece:<br />
But Wine Spectator — which describes one South African cabernet in the current issue as having notes of “grilled beef, charcoal, hot tar and truffle” — had to be won over. “At first they said, ‘It’s not for sale,’ ” Mr. Halme said. “They thought it might compromise editorial or clutter the page.”</p>
<p>But a statement from Dentsu boasts that the ads “look as if they are integrated into editorial.”</p>
<p>“It’s interesting that they’re bragging about having pulled a fast one,” said Roy Peter Clark, vice president of the Poynter Institute, a journalism school. “Instead of being transparent about the separation between editorial and advertising content, there is an attempt to blur distinctions.”</p>
<p>Food (or wine) for thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276685</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276685</guid>
		<description>Wish I could figure out how to describe my ideas as well as you do - mebbe I'd be an A lister too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could figure out how to describe my ideas as well as you do - mebbe I&#8217;d be an A lister too ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276591</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276591</guid>
		<description>The newness of the medium isn't the issue, it's the oldness of the practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newness of the medium isn&#8217;t the issue, it&#8217;s the oldness of the practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276586</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Hammock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276586</guid>
		<description>I like Rob's suggestion. There is a sense that this is a time where we're moving through the negotiation of what is and isn't ethical or appropriate. I wasn't around to witness the birth of radio or TV broadcasting, but I am sure those who were can tell us about TV news people who also presented the ads -- that's typical still in local "soft news" programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Rob&#8217;s suggestion. There is a sense that this is a time where we&#8217;re moving through the negotiation of what is and isn&#8217;t ethical or appropriate. I wasn&#8217;t around to witness the birth of radio or TV broadcasting, but I am sure those who were can tell us about TV news people who also presented the ads &#8212; that&#8217;s typical still in local &#8220;soft news&#8221; programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
