<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A free and open market in credibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-277057</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277057</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Frank.  There&#039;s no question that blurring the line between editorial and advertising is something that has been going on since print was invented.

What I find interesting (and different) about the phenomenon when it comes to blogs is that it is a personal brand or credibility that is at stake, rather than one that adheres to an institution or media outlet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Frank.  There&#8217;s no question that blurring the line between editorial and advertising is something that has been going on since print was invented.</p>
<p>What I find interesting (and different) about the phenomenon when it comes to blogs is that it is a personal brand or credibility that is at stake, rather than one that adheres to an institution or media outlet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-277017</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-277017</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful post.  You are absolutely right about trust being the central issue; but I still struggle in this case to see any transparency or trust challenges. Saw this article in the NYT today about a slightly similar issue in the magazine world:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html

Here is the relevant piece:
But Wine Spectator â€” which describes one South African cabernet in the current issue as having notes of â€œgrilled beef, charcoal, hot tar and truffleâ€ â€” had to be won over. â€œAt first they said, â€˜Itâ€™s not for sale,â€™ â€ Mr. Halme said. â€œThey thought it might compromise editorial or clutter the page.â€

But a statement from Dentsu boasts that the ads â€œlook as if they are integrated into editorial.â€

â€œItâ€™s interesting that theyâ€™re bragging about having pulled a fast one,â€ said Roy Peter Clark, vice president of the Poynter Institute, a journalism school. â€œInstead of being transparent about the separation between editorial and advertising content, there is an attempt to blur distinctions.â€

Food (or wine) for thought?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful post.  You are absolutely right about trust being the central issue; but I still struggle in this case to see any transparency or trust challenges. Saw this article in the NYT today about a slightly similar issue in the magazine world:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/business/media/25wine.html</a></p>
<p>Here is the relevant piece:<br />
But Wine Spectator â€” which describes one South African cabernet in the current issue as having notes of â€œgrilled beef, charcoal, hot tar and truffleâ€ â€” had to be won over. â€œAt first they said, â€˜Itâ€™s not for sale,â€™ â€ Mr. Halme said. â€œThey thought it might compromise editorial or clutter the page.â€</p>
<p>But a statement from Dentsu boasts that the ads â€œlook as if they are integrated into editorial.â€</p>
<p>â€œItâ€™s interesting that theyâ€™re bragging about having pulled a fast one,â€ said Roy Peter Clark, vice president of the Poynter Institute, a journalism school. â€œInstead of being transparent about the separation between editorial and advertising content, there is an attempt to blur distinctions.â€</p>
<p>Food (or wine) for thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-276685</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276685</guid>
		<description>Wish I could figure out how to describe my ideas as well as you do - mebbe I&#039;d be an A lister too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could figure out how to describe my ideas as well as you do &#8211; mebbe I&#8217;d be an A lister too ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-276591</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276591</guid>
		<description>The newness of the medium isn&#039;t the issue, it&#039;s the oldness of the practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newness of the medium isn&#8217;t the issue, it&#8217;s the oldness of the practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/comment-page-1/#comment-276586</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Hammock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/24/a-free-and-open-market-in-credibility/#comment-276586</guid>
		<description>I like Rob&#039;s suggestion. There is a sense that this is a time where we&#039;re moving through the negotiation of what is and isn&#039;t ethical or appropriate. I wasn&#039;t around to witness the birth of radio or TV broadcasting, but I am sure those who were can tell us about TV news people who also presented the ads -- that&#039;s typical still in local &quot;soft news&quot; programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Rob&#8217;s suggestion. There is a sense that this is a time where we&#8217;re moving through the negotiation of what is and isn&#8217;t ethical or appropriate. I wasn&#8217;t around to witness the birth of radio or TV broadcasting, but I am sure those who were can tell us about TV news people who also presented the ads &#8212; that&#8217;s typical still in local &#8220;soft news&#8221; programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

