<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying things isn&#8217;t the hard part</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/comment-page-1/#comment-275061</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/#comment-275061</guid>
		<description>Agred. It might be worth revisiting what Steve Jobs had to do at Apple to get them back on their feet. It&#039;s easy to point at the new products but there was a lot of project-killing as in the Newton, stopping the clones, and winnowing down the products to a matrix. At the time many of those moves seemed dangerous and angered people (especially the employees whose projects were axed) but maybe some bold moves are in order at Yahoo!. I think, sadly, you know what I&#039;m hinting at...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agred. It might be worth revisiting what Steve Jobs had to do at Apple to get them back on their feet. It&#8217;s easy to point at the new products but there was a lot of project-killing as in the Newton, stopping the clones, and winnowing down the products to a matrix. At the time many of those moves seemed dangerous and angered people (especially the employees whose projects were axed) but maybe some bold moves are in order at Yahoo!. I think, sadly, you know what I&#8217;m hinting at&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/comment-page-1/#comment-275055</link>
		<dc:creator>Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/21/buying-things-isnt-the-hard-part/#comment-275055</guid>
		<description>Like you stated if the numberrs actually stand up the deal is great for Yahoo as long as they don&#039;t mess things up to much (real revenue-good stuff). The very focused audience is great for ad sales. They&#039;ll save some decent cash on the back-end tech costs since Yahoo should easily be able to incorporate that into their network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you stated if the numberrs actually stand up the deal is great for Yahoo as long as they don&#8217;t mess things up to much (real revenue-good stuff). The very focused audience is great for ad sales. They&#8217;ll save some decent cash on the back-end tech costs since Yahoo should easily be able to incorporate that into their network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

