<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iLike: Riding the Facebook tsunami</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/comment-page-1/#comment-271274</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/#comment-271274</guid>
		<description>Bah, it seems like the popular thing here is iLike + Facebook. I&#039;m curious whether iLike or Facebook are going to benefit individually. iLike got a TON of new users off this and greatly increased their exposure...but will this translate into people going to their site and providing them with non-Facebook users (and more importantly...will that even be necessary?). Though the fact that we are even talking about iLike right now is a huge win for them.

And while the iLike app is wildly popular, is it serving facebook by attracting people that weren&#039;t already using facebook? It&#039;s one thing to provide plugins to your members...but I think facebook will only really benefit if they can increase their share of the market. And I still can&#039;t think of any kind of app that anyone could make that will convince someone who uses myspace to switch to facebook or get someone like me who doesn&#039;t use any socnet services to start. 

The amazing thing here would be if iLike could make money (or generate a lot of loyal users) JUST from the facebook platform. The day a facebook API app generates significant revenue off just the facebook market will be a big landmark in the evolution of internet applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, it seems like the popular thing here is iLike + Facebook. I&#8217;m curious whether iLike or Facebook are going to benefit individually. iLike got a TON of new users off this and greatly increased their exposure&#8230;but will this translate into people going to their site and providing them with non-Facebook users (and more importantly&#8230;will that even be necessary?). Though the fact that we are even talking about iLike right now is a huge win for them.</p>
<p>And while the iLike app is wildly popular, is it serving facebook by attracting people that weren&#8217;t already using facebook? It&#8217;s one thing to provide plugins to your members&#8230;but I think facebook will only really benefit if they can increase their share of the market. And I still can&#8217;t think of any kind of app that anyone could make that will convince someone who uses myspace to switch to facebook or get someone like me who doesn&#8217;t use any socnet services to start. </p>
<p>The amazing thing here would be if iLike could make money (or generate a lot of loyal users) JUST from the facebook platform. The day a facebook API app generates significant revenue off just the facebook market will be a big landmark in the evolution of internet applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/comment-page-1/#comment-271253</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/#comment-271253</guid>
		<description>Sorry Matt, I can&#039;t help myself... totally off topic, but... iLike sounds like a web 2.0 company started by Borat.

&quot;What company did you start? iLikeeeeeee...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Matt, I can&#8217;t help myself&#8230; totally off topic, but&#8230; iLike sounds like a web 2.0 company started by Borat.</p>
<p>&#8220;What company did you start? iLikeeeeeee&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod/techfold.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/comment-page-1/#comment-271162</link>
		<dc:creator>rod/techfold.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/12/ilike-riding-the-facebook-tsunami/#comment-271162</guid>
		<description>Wow - I wrote some thoughts a while back on F8/facebook trying to become the next microsoft by building the platform on which the next generation of online software will be built. At the time I wasn&#039;t 100% sold that it would actually come to pass, but stories like this are solidifying my opinion in favour of Facebook&#039;s ability to execute. When businesses like iLike can be built and be successful on the back of a social network platform without fear of MySpace-esque reprisals (bannings, etc) - you know you&#039;ve got something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I wrote some thoughts a while back on F8/facebook trying to become the next microsoft by building the platform on which the next generation of online software will be built. At the time I wasn&#8217;t 100% sold that it would actually come to pass, but stories like this are solidifying my opinion in favour of Facebook&#8217;s ability to execute. When businesses like iLike can be built and be successful on the back of a social network platform without fear of MySpace-esque reprisals (bannings, etc) &#8211; you know you&#8217;ve got something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

