<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSFT and Yahoo: two icebergs, roped together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Head Bang</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/comment-page-1/#comment-337038</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Head Bang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/#comment-337038</guid>
		<description>p.s. obviously I didn&#039;t mean to post that twice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. obviously I didn&#8217;t mean to post that twice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Head Bang</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/comment-page-1/#comment-337037</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Head Bang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/#comment-337037</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fair enough to say that Yahoo and MSN don&#039;t have the same volumes as Google, but they are still powerful, and because their algorithms aren&#039;t as tight they are easier to manipulate. This means they are still likely to attract attention from commercial sites.

I found a really good write up on the &#039;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO impact on small business&lt;/a&gt;&#039; if this take-over goes through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fair enough to say that Yahoo and MSN don&#8217;t have the same volumes as Google, but they are still powerful, and because their algorithms aren&#8217;t as tight they are easier to manipulate. This means they are still likely to attract attention from commercial sites.</p>
<p>I found a really good write up on the &#8216;<a href="http://www.demonzmedia.com/DemonzBlog/?p=5" rel="nofollow">SEO impact on small business</a>&#8216; if this take-over goes through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Head Bang</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/comment-page-1/#comment-337035</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Head Bang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/#comment-337035</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fair enough to say that Yahoo and MSN don&#039;t have the same volumes as Google, but they are still powerful, and because their algorithms aren&#039;t as tight they are easier to manipulate. This means they are still likely to attract attention from commercial sites.

I found a really good write up on this to this effect -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fair enough to say that Yahoo and MSN don&#8217;t have the same volumes as Google, but they are still powerful, and because their algorithms aren&#8217;t as tight they are easier to manipulate. This means they are still likely to attract attention from commercial sites.</p>
<p>I found a really good write up on this to this effect -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/comment-page-1/#comment-255220</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/#comment-255220</guid>
		<description>Hard to believe that the stock can be so easily manipulated like that from a rumored story.  Journalists beware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe that the stock can be so easily manipulated like that from a rumored story.  Journalists beware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/comment-page-1/#comment-254961</link>
		<dc:creator>George Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/04/msft-and-yahoo-two-icebergs-roped-together/#comment-254961</guid>
		<description>This is great for Google! Can you imagine how long it will take Microsoft and Yahoo to merge their business operations together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great for Google! Can you imagine how long it will take Microsoft and Yahoo to merge their business operations together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

