<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter &#8212; like SMS but for the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-245944</link>
		<dc:creator>M Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/#comment-245944</guid>
		<description>I have been trying to wrap my head around twittter for a few weeks now. I do enjoy reading what my &quot;friends&quot; are doing, and I enjoy telling them what I am doing - to a certain degree, but I can almost see the novelty factor wearing off very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to wrap my head around twittter for a few weeks now. I do enjoy reading what my &#8220;friends&#8221; are doing, and I enjoy telling them what I am doing &#8211; to a certain degree, but I can almost see the novelty factor wearing off very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-245681</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/#comment-245681</guid>
		<description>The full potential of Twitter hasn&#039;t yet been realized.

I&#039;ve added my Twitter RSS feed into a &#039;Lifestream&#039;, including stuff from Last.fm, Del.icio.us, my &#039;blog et cetera. using Yahoo! Pipes.

In one fell swoop, I&#039;ve gone from the from intermittent, isolated and seemingly random posts on my &#039;blog to providing (those with the will and time to read my feed) a narrative of where the inspiration comes from.

I might not be the most compelling narrator, but I&#039;m sure there are guys out there who will make something like this The Next Big Thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full potential of Twitter hasn&#8217;t yet been realized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added my Twitter RSS feed into a &#8216;Lifestream&#8217;, including stuff from Last.fm, <a href="http://Del.icio.us" title="http://Del.icio.us" target="_blank">Del.icio.us</a>, my &#8216;blog et cetera. using Yahoo! Pipes.</p>
<p>In one fell swoop, I&#8217;ve gone from the from intermittent, isolated and seemingly random posts on my &#8216;blog to providing (those with the will and time to read my feed) a narrative of where the inspiration comes from.</p>
<p>I might not be the most compelling narrator, but I&#8217;m sure there are guys out there who will make something like this The Next Big Thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-245517</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/#comment-245517</guid>
		<description>SMS is (in most cases) one-to-one. Twitter is one-to-many. In my opinion, Twitter is not going to go far, simply because all of its functionality could be easily replaced by any Instant Messaging program. I honestly wonder why haven&#039;t any of them reacted yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMS is (in most cases) one-to-one. Twitter is one-to-many. In my opinion, Twitter is not going to go far, simply because all of its functionality could be easily replaced by any Instant Messaging program. I honestly wonder why haven&#8217;t any of them reacted yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jope</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-245486</link>
		<dc:creator>Jope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/04/08/twitter-like-sms-but-for-the-web/#comment-245486</guid>
		<description>Me, I&#039;ve been fascinated by the whole Twitter thing. I tried it a couple of months ago, wrote about it and promptly forgot it as well...

And I think you&#039;re right, US bloggers find twitter fascinating because of the SMS part mostly, and since in Europe we&#039;ve been using SMS for some years now, the novelty just isn&#039;t there.

The worst part, for Twitter, will be when the fad dies away, as it seems to be doing (check twitter.com&#039;s traffic in Alexa, it seems to have reached a peak).

Now, destroying our lives? No, you just need to be aware of the usage conventions for any instant messaging, SMS not being very different that any messenger-like app: don&#039;t use it if you need immediate reply, don&#039;t even expect a reply, don&#039;t expect to engage into a conversation through it, etc, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, I&#8217;ve been fascinated by the whole Twitter thing. I tried it a couple of months ago, wrote about it and promptly forgot it as well&#8230;</p>
<p>And I think you&#8217;re right, US bloggers find twitter fascinating because of the SMS part mostly, and since in Europe we&#8217;ve been using SMS for some years now, the novelty just isn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>The worst part, for Twitter, will be when the fad dies away, as it seems to be doing (check <a href="http://twitter.com" title="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">twitter.com</a>&#8216;s traffic in Alexa, it seems to have reached a peak).</p>
<p>Now, destroying our lives? No, you just need to be aware of the usage conventions for any instant messaging, SMS not being very different that any messenger-like app: don&#8217;t use it if you need immediate reply, don&#8217;t even expect a reply, don&#8217;t expect to engage into a conversation through it, etc, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

