<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco plus WebEx: smart or desperate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/#comment-237799</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/#comment-237799</guid>
		<description>Matthew: this move might be consistent with Cisco’s migration to the desktop, but as you mention, the product is a bit iffy. I’ve had the same experiences as you have — “everybody, *please* make sure you log in at least 30 minutes early to figure out how to configure the thing, or I’ll just be giving a speech…” The switching costs are negligent — and I’m not sure there’s much brand loyalty here. 

But, unless things have changed dramatically since I last looked, they still had the vast lion’s share of this business in their hands. The product may be a ‘tear down’ to industry insiders, but when people talk about web conferencing, they talk about WebEx, don’t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew: this move might be consistent with Cisco’s migration to the desktop, but as you mention, the product is a bit iffy. I’ve had the same experiences as you have — “everybody, *please* make sure you log in at least 30 minutes early to figure out how to configure the thing, or I’ll just be giving a speech…” The switching costs are negligent — and I’m not sure there’s much brand loyalty here. </p>
<p>But, unless things have changed dramatically since I last looked, they still had the vast lion’s share of this business in their hands. The product may be a ‘tear down’ to industry insiders, but when people talk about web conferencing, they talk about WebEx, don’t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee S.</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/#comment-237780</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/15/cisco-plus-webex-smart-or-desperate/#comment-237780</guid>
		<description>Mathew, I couldn't agree more. I switched to Yugma recently and it does everything I need. It's much easier, and the best part is that the account is free forever. Definately worth looking at.  
http://www.yugma.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I switched to Yugma recently and it does everything I need. It&#8217;s much easier, and the best part is that the account is free forever. Definately worth looking at.<br />
<a href="http://www.yugma.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yugma.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
