Comments on: Bloggers are parasites — so what? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/05/bloggers-are-parasites-so-what/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Mathew http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/05/bloggers-are-parasites-so-what/comment-page-1/#comment-234857 Mathew Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:58:58 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/05/bloggers-are-parasites-so-what/#comment-234857 I agree, Tony. I agree, Tony.

]]> By: Tony http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/05/bloggers-are-parasites-so-what/comment-page-1/#comment-234834 Tony Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:29:58 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/05/bloggers-are-parasites-so-what/#comment-234834 Never mind that mainstream media of all stripes have been leeching off of each other for years -- I find it enormously hypocritical that they label bloggers for something they've been doing for a long time. After all, (some) bloggers are just as good following a piece of news published (or "broke") by some media giants as some journalists [present company excluded of course]-- and almost all are a great deal faster. Cheers t Never mind that mainstream media of all stripes have been leeching off of each other for years — I find it enormously hypocritical that they label bloggers for something they’ve been doing for a long time.

After all, (some) bloggers are just as good following a piece of news published (or “broke”) by some media giants as some journalists [present company excluded of course]– and almost all are a great deal faster.

Cheers
t

]]>