<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired&#8217;s Digg slam is offside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/comment-page-1/#comment-233559</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/#comment-233559</guid>
		<description>The specific problem does seem to be pretty widespread.  User/Submitter has been around for months, and are buying diggs for about one story an hour.

Here are a list of a few recent ones:
http://lukewelling.com/2007/03/03/diggs-kevin-rose-has-an-account-on-usersubmitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specific problem does seem to be pretty widespread.  User/Submitter has been around for months, and are buying diggs for about one story an hour.</p>
<p>Here are a list of a few recent ones:<br />
<a href="http://lukewelling.com/2007/03/03/diggs-kevin-rose-has-an-account-on-usersubmitter/" rel="nofollow">http://lukewelling.com/2007/03/03/diggs-kevin-rose-has-an-account-on-usersubmitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/comment-page-1/#comment-233434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/#comment-233434</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have to say that I think the relationship between Reddit and Wired is a lot closer than between the Globe and Bell Canada.&quot;

Agreed. 

It seems a question of editorial judgment.  You&#039;d be the editor that would&#039;ve frustrated the hell out of me in my younger years,  but I do see your point about the optics of aggressively going after a story when you&#039;re potentially in a conflict of interest position. 

Personally, I&#039;d do the story and not worry about the optics. But I&#039;d be extra careful to be sure we got the facts right.

But to your point, Wired did pay a price in terms of reputation for doing the story. Even if I think the critics are wrong, they did enough to call Wired&#039;s editorial integrity into question. 

And I&#039;m not sure it was worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have to say that I think the relationship between Reddit and Wired is a lot closer than between the Globe and Bell Canada.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed. </p>
<p>It seems a question of editorial judgment.  You&#8217;d be the editor that would&#8217;ve frustrated the hell out of me in my younger years,  but I do see your point about the optics of aggressively going after a story when you&#8217;re potentially in a conflict of interest position. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d do the story and not worry about the optics. But I&#8217;d be extra careful to be sure we got the facts right.</p>
<p>But to your point, Wired did pay a price in terms of reputation for doing the story. Even if I think the critics are wrong, they did enough to call Wired&#8217;s editorial integrity into question. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure it was worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/comment-page-1/#comment-233364</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/#comment-233364</guid>
		<description>I think it is more a case of the New York Times not seeing you as a competitor.

Think of Great Cthullu. The humans on the planet are not even a thought to him. To the humans on the planet, he holds a very large place in the thoughts of the people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is more a case of the New York Times not seeing you as a competitor.</p>
<p>Think of Great Cthullu. The humans on the planet are not even a thought to him. To the humans on the planet, he holds a very large place in the thoughts of the people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/comment-page-1/#comment-233356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/#comment-233356</guid>
		<description>HMTKSteve, are you suggesting that my blog doesn&#039;t compete with the New York Times?  :-)

And Karl, I will take you up on your wager -- but you can keep the cheese steak, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HMTKSteve, are you suggesting that my blog doesn&#8217;t compete with the New York Times?  :-)</p>
<p>And Karl, I will take you up on your wager &#8212; but you can keep the cheese steak, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/comment-page-1/#comment-233355</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/03/01/wireds-digg-slam-is-offside/#comment-233355</guid>
		<description>I think part of the story here is that the gaming of Digg and Digg&#039;s problems have long been circulating among the Digg bloggers.

Wired is one of the tech magazines that diggers like to read. 

Reddit? A competitor to Digg? They are as  much of a Digg competitor as this blog is to the New York times!

Digg came out and said, &quot;you can&#039;t game us, we have mad skillz, go away you hackers!&quot;
Someone called them on it, &quot;Look, I got this crappy site on the Digg homepage!&quot;
Then Digg turns around and says, &quot;Hey, I wasn&#039;t ready, that didn&#039;t count.. Wait a minute... You are from a competitor... discredit! discredit! discredit!&quot;

They did the same thing when a blogger reproduced the top 100 list after they dumped it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the story here is that the gaming of Digg and Digg&#8217;s problems have long been circulating among the Digg bloggers.</p>
<p>Wired is one of the tech magazines that diggers like to read. </p>
<p>Reddit? A competitor to Digg? They are as  much of a Digg competitor as this blog is to the New York times!</p>
<p>Digg came out and said, &#8220;you can&#8217;t game us, we have mad skillz, go away you hackers!&#8221;<br />
Someone called them on it, &#8220;Look, I got this crappy site on the Digg homepage!&#8221;<br />
Then Digg turns around and says, &#8220;Hey, I wasn&#8217;t ready, that didn&#8217;t count.. Wait a minute&#8230; You are from a competitor&#8230; discredit! discredit! discredit!&#8221;</p>
<p>They did the same thing when a blogger reproduced the top 100 list after they dumped it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
