<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who, us&#063; An Office suite&#063; Never.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raju Vegesna</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/comment-page-1/#comment-233003</link>
		<dc:creator>Raju Vegesna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/#comment-233003</guid>
		<description>Google certainly doesn&#039;t want to call themselves an office suite...but when you search for &#039;Online Office&#039; in Google, the first ad that comes up is &#039;Office tools from Google&#039; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google certainly doesn&#8217;t want to call themselves an office suite&#8230;but when you search for &#8216;Online Office&#8217; in Google, the first ad that comes up is &#8216;Office tools from Google&#8217; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/comment-page-1/#comment-230426</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/#comment-230426</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Vanessa.  I still think the answer is apps and services that blend online and offline, the way that Zoho is trying to.  That&#039;s where I expect Google to go next -- and perhaps Microsoft as well.  I certainly would be if I were them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Vanessa.  I still think the answer is apps and services that blend online and offline, the way that Zoho is trying to.  That&#8217;s where I expect Google to go next &#8212; and perhaps Microsoft as well.  I certainly would be if I were them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/comment-page-1/#comment-230392</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/22/who-us-an-office-suite-never/#comment-230392</guid>
		<description>I think Mary Jo Foley is dead-on about businesses not wanting to store data in the cloud. It&#039;s a fact. And while Paul K. may be right about SMB&#039;s preferring this over paying the full cost of MS Office, there are other ways to do this (OpenOffice, for example), which are a) free, and b) don&#039;t force you to turn over your business communications to a third-party. 

There is surely room for all these sorts of solutions, and new types we haven&#039;t seen (much of) yet, besides.

It&#039;s tempting to search for a single, elegant, unified theory of network-centric applications, but unifiying the desktop and the web may turn out to be like unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics: a real brain-bender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mary Jo Foley is dead-on about businesses not wanting to store data in the cloud. It&#8217;s a fact. And while Paul K. may be right about SMB&#8217;s preferring this over paying the full cost of MS Office, there are other ways to do this (OpenOffice, for example), which are a) free, and b) don&#8217;t force you to turn over your business communications to a third-party. </p>
<p>There is surely room for all these sorts of solutions, and new types we haven&#8217;t seen (much of) yet, besides.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tempting to search for a single, elegant, unified theory of network-centric applications, but unifiying the desktop and the web may turn out to be like unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics: a real brain-bender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

