<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Belgium and Google &#8212; stupid, stupid, stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/13/belgium-and-google-stupid-stupid-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/13/belgium-and-google-stupid-stupid-stupid/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/13/belgium-and-google-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-227478</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/13/belgium-and-google-stupid-stupid-stupid/#comment-227478</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, this victory could signal the end of easy access to news stories online. Agencies like copiepresse, have their equals in many countries and I just hoe that none of them will follow suit. I think that this is either some bureaucratic atack on what they perceive to be an american incursion on their property, or a complet lack of understanding of what is actually happening out in today'S web. If they think that Google in a deterant to them trying to sell their own content, well they should observe what many networks here in canada o with their online content. Teasing us to no-end with their subscription based access, until a certain amount of time has passed. i.e. Canada.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, this victory could signal the end of easy access to news stories online. Agencies like copiepresse, have their equals in many countries and I just hoe that none of them will follow suit. I think that this is either some bureaucratic atack on what they perceive to be an american incursion on their property, or a complet lack of understanding of what is actually happening out in today&#8217;S web. If they think that Google in a deterant to them trying to sell their own content, well they should observe what many networks here in canada o with their online content. Teasing us to no-end with their subscription based access, until a certain amount of time has passed. i.e. <a href="http://Canada.com" title="http://Canada.com" target="_blank">Canada.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
