Comments on: Is Wikipedia really in danger? http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: YuzeroK http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-337204 YuzeroK Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:32:26 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/#comment-337204 Хороший заработок в интернете. Нужно покоментировать страницы, которые вам откроют после регистрации, и за это платят денги и не малые. Я лично зарабатываю около 500$ в месяц. Регистрируемся тут <a href="http://www.AWSurveys.com/HomeMain.cfm?RefID=yuzerok" rel="nofollow">awsurveys.com</a> 1.Нажимите Create A Free Account UserName - имя пользователя Password - пароль 7-15 знаков First Name - имя Last Name - Фамилия Email Address - почтовый ящик Далее вводим цифорки-буковки, нажимаем кнопку Create A Free Account Вы зарегистрировались! 2.Далее видим таблицу, имеющую такой вид: The Following Surveys are Available: Welcome Survey -- A $6.00 Website Evaluation is Available. A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available. A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available. A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available. A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available. A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available. 3.Щелкаем по одной из ссылок на этой странице, попадаем на следущюю страницу и там щелкаем по надписи "Start Survey Now" 4.Здесь 2 ссылки и 2 поля, в них нужно написать отзыв о сайте на англ языке. (пример: It is an excellent site, I shall advise its all, this is good job, it's very usefull web-resource и т.п) 5.Щелкае по кнопке внизу "Click to submit ..." Щелкаем по ссылке "Click Here to go Home and..." 6.И так далее по ссылкам и так каждый день. 7.Для вывода денег воспользуйтесь кнопкой "Redeem Money" выводятся деньги в системе PayPal (легко переводятся в вебмани) могу помочь тем кто не знаком с электронными платежными системами Хороший заработок в интернете. Нужно покоментировать страницы, которые вам откроют после регистрации, и за это платят денги и не малые. Я лично зарабатываю около 500$ в месяц.

Регистрируемся тут awsurveys.com

1.Нажимите Create A Free Account

UserName – имя пользователя
Password – пароль 7-15 знаков
First Name – имя
Last Name – Фамилия
Email Address – почтовый ящик
Далее вводим цифорки-буковки, нажимаем кнопку Create A Free Account
Вы зарегистрировались!

2.Далее видим таблицу, имеющую такой вид:

The Following Surveys are Available:
Welcome Survey — A $6.00 Website Evaluation is Available.
A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available.
A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available.
A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available.
A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available.
A $4.00 Website Evaluation is Available.

3.Щелкаем по одной из ссылок на этой странице, попадаем на следущюю страницу и там щелкаем по надписи “Start Survey Now”

4.Здесь 2 ссылки и 2 поля, в них нужно написать отзыв о сайте на англ языке.

(пример: It is an excellent site, I shall advise its all, this is good job, it’s very usefull web-resource и Ñ‚.п)

5.Щелкае по кнопке внизу “Click to submit …” Щелкаем по ссылке “Click Here to go Home and…”

6.И так далее по ссылкам и так каждый день.

7.Для вывода денег воспользуйтесь кнопкой “Redeem Money”
выводятся деньги в системе PayPal (легко переводятся в вебмани)
могу помочь тем кто не знаком с электронными платежными системами

]]> By: Mohamed Yaseen Kassam http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-226702 Mohamed Yaseen Kassam Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:29:42 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/#comment-226702 Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia's founder) working on a search project with Amazon. Surely, that will generate some revenues for the Wikimedia Foundation. Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia’s founder) working on a search project with Amazon. Surely, that will generate some revenues for the Wikimedia Foundation.

]]> By: BrunoG http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-226443 BrunoG Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:27:52 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/#comment-226443 Thanks for linking to my posts Mathew. In fact, Devouard's comments were not "an exaggeration" - she said they had money in the bank for 3/4 months, but never translated that into "Wikipedia is going to shut down" as some bloggers have done. There are many questions of course surrounding the sustainability of Wikipedia given the incredible growth and the feeble revenue streams, but Devouard told me repeatedly at LIFT that she did not worry about the future of Wikipedia. B- Thanks for linking to my posts Mathew. In fact, Devouard’s comments were not “an exaggeration” – she said they had money in the bank for 3/4 months, but never translated that into “Wikipedia is going to shut down” as some bloggers have done. There are many questions of course surrounding the sustainability of Wikipedia given the incredible growth and the feeble revenue streams, but Devouard told me repeatedly at LIFT that she did not worry about the future of Wikipedia. B-

]]> By: Alex http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-226441 Alex Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:17:26 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/#comment-226441 I also am also all for wikipedia puts ads on their website, as long as they do it inhouse and not partnered with google or yahoo or msn, and there is no kickbacks of money to the article authors. Wikipedia is growing in mindshare everyday. I am finding when I search on google for information, that 95% of the time the best article is the top 10 is from wikipedia.org, and then I think "Why didn't I go to wikipedia in the first place?" => Old habits die hard but I can see over time, more and more people will just goto wikipedia and skip google/yahoo/msn when searching for information. Wikipedia could potentially make as much $$ or more than google is making if they start showing ads. They can funnel that money back into improving wikipedia.org and expanding the service, or even advertising that wikipedia is the best place to find information on the web. Wikipedia may even be able to allow registered users to opt-out of the ads, and still make enough $$ off of advertising to pay basic costs. I also am also all for wikipedia puts ads on their website, as long as they do it inhouse and not partnered with google or yahoo or msn, and there is no kickbacks of money to the article authors.

Wikipedia is growing in mindshare everyday. I am finding when I search on google for information, that 95% of the time the best article is the top 10 is from wikipedia.org, and then I think “Why didn’t I go to wikipedia in the first place?” => Old habits die hard but I can see over time, more and more people will just goto wikipedia and skip google/yahoo/msn when searching for information.

Wikipedia could potentially make as much $$ or more than google is making if they start showing ads. They can funnel that money back into improving wikipedia.org and expanding the service, or even advertising that wikipedia is the best place to find information on the web.

Wikipedia may even be able to allow registered users to opt-out of the ads, and still make enough $$ off of advertising to pay basic costs.

]]> By: Joost http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-226427 Joost Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:55:50 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/10/is-wikipedia-really-in-danger/#comment-226427 How could you no be able to keep the site alive with the millions they recieved in donations, I mean bandwidth is actually quite cheap - and I"m sure many companies like google would offer help in that respect just to have their name affiliated with wikipedia - they could say "We donate to wikipedia" makes them look good. How could you no be able to keep the site alive with the millions they recieved in donations, I mean bandwidth is actually quite cheap – and I”m sure many companies like google would offer help in that respect just to have their name affiliated with wikipedia – they could say “We donate to wikipedia” makes them look good.

]]>