<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s good for Steve is good for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-224331</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/#comment-224331</guid>
		<description>It looks like my Steve jobs quote may have been attributed to this: http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/the_end_of_drm_as_we_know_it_1.html

And it may have been a statement made on Apple&#039;s part but attributed to Jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like my Steve jobs quote may have been attributed to this: <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/the_end_of_drm_as_we_know_it_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/the_end_of_drm_as_we_know_it_1.html</a></p>
<p>And it may have been a statement made on Apple&#8217;s part but attributed to Jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-224323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/#comment-224323</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Mark  (and Steven).  And HMTKSteve, I&#039;m not aware of Jobs saying anything like that -- although it&#039;s possible that he did.  I looked around in Google for a bit this morning and couldn&#039;t find anything, although I did come across the quote that Mark mentions a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Mark  (and Steven).  And HMTKSteve, I&#8217;m not aware of Jobs saying anything like that &#8212; although it&#8217;s possible that he did.  I looked around in Google for a bit this morning and couldn&#8217;t find anything, although I did come across the quote that Mark mentions a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-224225</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/#comment-224225</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Steve Jobs once say that even if the labels did not want DRM he would still use it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Steve Jobs once say that even if the labels did not want DRM he would still use it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hodson</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-223889</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/#comment-223889</guid>
		<description>Another case of JobsSpeak which deflects the problem away from him and lays it at the feet of the big recording companies which are owned (in his words) by European companies .. an effort to get the EU lawsuits against Apple and DRM nullified in the publics mind.

http://www.winextra.com/?p=276</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another case of JobsSpeak which deflects the problem away from him and lays it at the feet of the big recording companies which are owned (in his words) by European companies .. an effort to get the EU lawsuits against Apple and DRM nullified in the publics mind.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.winextra.com/?p=276" rel="nofollow">http://www.winextra.com/?p=276</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-223863</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 05:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/02/06/whats-good-for-steve-is-good-for-you/#comment-223863</guid>
		<description>And there&#039;s another self-serving reason: Apple&#039;s negotiations with the labels are coming up. 

He&#039;s just getting the market to be on his side when he confronts the labels with this, and thus reduce the cost he&#039;ll have to pay to get it. Remember that Universal&#039;s going in position is a few dollars per iPod sold, a la its Zune deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s another self-serving reason: Apple&#8217;s negotiations with the labels are coming up. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s just getting the market to be on his side when he confronts the labels with this, and thus reduce the cost he&#8217;ll have to pay to get it. Remember that Universal&#8217;s going in position is a few dollars per iPod sold, a la its Zune deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

