<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg, Stumble and the madness of crowds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-215924</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-215924</guid>
		<description>I agree that not all traffic is considered equal but the main purpose of Digg is not to be a PR or lead generation site. It's a news site. Just because a blogger has one interesting article that has been deemed newsworthy doesn't mean their site is worthy of another visit. Like they say, you only have one chance to make a good first impression.

I'm sure there will be a 5 step article/blog post written about getting the most from being dugg. Heck, an article like that seems like digg/link bait to me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that not all traffic is considered equal but the main purpose of Digg is not to be a PR or lead generation site. It&#8217;s a news site. Just because a blogger has one interesting article that has been deemed newsworthy doesn&#8217;t mean their site is worthy of another visit. Like they say, you only have one chance to make a good first impression.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there will be a 5 step article/blog post written about getting the most from being dugg. Heck, an article like that seems like digg/link bait to me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-215494</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-215494</guid>
		<description>I agree that Digg-driven traffic isn't all it's cracked up to be. However, while all traffic isn't equal, *most* publishers would agree that all traffic is better than no traffic! 

In any event, I think the interesting thing here is that the focus is on the Digg community i.e. the people visiting and perhaps dropping negative comments on digg-linked sites. What if there was a nicer, friendlier, more stick-around kind of community driven by a social news site? While this sort of thing would be no easy feat to conjure, I believe that popular social news verticals will emerge that may create an environment that is more conducive to people sticking around links they visit, clicking on things (perhaps even ads!), etc.

I'd love to see a StumbleUpon what's-the-deal-with-it post, Mathew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Digg-driven traffic isn&#8217;t all it&#8217;s cracked up to be. However, while all traffic isn&#8217;t equal, *most* publishers would agree that all traffic is better than no traffic! </p>
<p>In any event, I think the interesting thing here is that the focus is on the Digg community i.e. the people visiting and perhaps dropping negative comments on digg-linked sites. What if there was a nicer, friendlier, more stick-around kind of community driven by a social news site? While this sort of thing would be no easy feat to conjure, I believe that popular social news verticals will emerge that may create an environment that is more conducive to people sticking around links they visit, clicking on things (perhaps even ads!), etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a StumbleUpon what&#8217;s-the-deal-with-it post, Mathew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214612</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214612</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tony  :-)

And Engtech, it's interesting that even Violent Acres seems to be tiring of Digg -- she wrote a post recently about how "not everything I write needs to be Dugg."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tony  :-)</p>
<p>And Engtech, it&#8217;s interesting that even Violent Acres seems to be tiring of Digg &#8212; she wrote a post recently about how &#8220;not everything I write needs to be Dugg.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214582</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214582</guid>
		<description>I do like me some StumbleUpon.

Digg can really establish a blog though. pronetadvertising and violentacres come to mind as two sites I saw go from zero to an audience by writing content that got Dugg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like me some StumbleUpon.</p>
<p>Digg can really establish a blog though. pronetadvertising and violentacres come to mind as two sites I saw go from zero to an audience by writing content that got Dugg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214527</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/25/digg-stumble-and-the-madness-of-crowds/#comment-214527</guid>
		<description>Mat -- you can call me "just" Tony.  Everyone else needs written permission though. ;)

t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mat &#8212; you can call me &#8220;just&#8221; Tony.  Everyone else needs written permission though. ;)</p>
<p>t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
