<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google need more fiber in its diet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diet_Pill_That_Work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-373127</link>
		<dc:creator>Diet_Pill_That_Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/#comment-373127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so love this blog, already bookmarked it! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m so love this blog, already bookmarked it! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: game230</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-345586</link>
		<dc:creator>game230</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/#comment-345586</guid>
		<description>thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weight loss diets</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-345294</link>
		<dc:creator>weight loss diets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/#comment-345294</guid>
		<description>Many now interests how correctly to eat. The number of the people dissatisfied with the&lt;br&gt;figure or health recently has increased and, as consequence, trying to get rid of excess&lt;br&gt;weight. You should pick up a diet approaching you, and also learn to make correctly&lt;br&gt;balanced diet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many now interests how correctly to eat. The number of the people dissatisfied with the<br />figure or health recently has increased and, as consequence, trying to get rid of excess<br />weight. You should pick up a diet approaching you, and also learn to make correctly<br />balanced diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Only slightly bent &#187; Google, (IP-TV, user experience, Net infra..)</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-225027</link>
		<dc:creator>Only slightly bent &#187; Google, (IP-TV, user experience, Net infra..)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/#comment-225027</guid>
		<description>[...] So, assuming there will be bandwidth problems at the core (which is already quite an assumption), where to get the extra juice? Already for a couple of years, there has been talk of Google buying massive amounts of dark fiber. What for, nobody knows, but speculation has included stuff like a VoIP backbone. Considering the above comments, could Google be first creating and hyping up and then mercifully offering to solve the problem with their own backbone? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, assuming there will be bandwidth problems at the core (which is already quite an assumption), where to get the extra juice? Already for a couple of years, there has been talk of Google buying massive amounts of dark fiber. What for, nobody knows, but speculation has included stuff like a VoIP backbone. Considering the above comments, could Google be first creating and hyping up and then mercifully offering to solve the problem with their own backbone? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News in Vietnamese &#187; Google vÃ  chiáº¿n lÆ°á»£c VoIP</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-218385</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology News in Vietnamese &#187; Google vÃ  chiáº¿n lÆ°á»£c VoIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/20/does-google-need-more-fiber-in-its-diet/#comment-218385</guid>
		<description>[...] First, Google might partner with any number of telcos as a last-mile provider for a branded VoIP network, just as Apple recently partnered with Cingular to finish calls on its new iPhone. Google isnâ€™t sayingâ€”but then, itâ€™s not talking about all those unused (â€œdarkâ€) fiberoptic lines it bought, either, which could enable it to start its own VoIP network with only minimal outside involvement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, Google might partner with any number of telcos as a last-mile provider for a branded VoIP network, just as Apple recently partnered with Cingular to finish calls on its new iPhone. Google isnâ€™t sayingâ€”but then, itâ€™s not talking about all those unused (â€œdarkâ€) fiberoptic lines it bought, either, which could enable it to start its own VoIP network with only minimal outside involvement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
