<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daylife: The pitfalls of high expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/05/daylife-the-pitfalls-of-high-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/05/daylife-the-pitfalls-of-high-expectations/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Main Page :: Global Nerdy</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/05/daylife-the-pitfalls-of-high-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-169157</link>
		<dc:creator>Main Page :: Global Nerdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/05/daylife-the-pitfalls-of-high-expectations/#comment-169157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;launch early stages, so it was bound to get a throrough once-over when it de-cloaked, but after Mike &quot;Techcrunch&quot; Arrington deemed himself &quot;underwhelmed&quot; well, that raised the stakes a little.  It seems like a lot of the negative reviews stem from what I think is a misunderstanding of what people are really seeing when they look at Daylife. It&#039;s more than a simple news aggregator (like Google News, TechMeme, or Megite), and it&#039;s definitely not a news community (like &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->launch early stages, so it was bound to get a throrough once-over when it de-cloaked, but after Mike &#8220;Techcrunch&#8221; Arrington deemed himself &#8220;underwhelmed&#8221; well, that raised the stakes a little.  It seems like a lot of the negative reviews stem from what I think is a misunderstanding of what people are really seeing when they look at Daylife. It&#8217;s more than a simple news aggregator (like Google News, TechMeme, or Megite), and it&#8217;s definitely not a news community (like <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
