Comments on: Google wins — because it doesn’t suck http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: " » Technorati and Me" from Pro PR http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-339095 " » Technorati and Me" from Pro PR Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:27:03 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/#comment-339095 [...] just when my faith in Technorati was being challenged, Google enticed with its own social media search engine. I began to hang out more often with my new Google [...] [...] just when my faith in Technorati was being challenged, Google enticed with its own social media search engine. I began to hang out more often with my new Google [...]

]]> By: Congrats to Sphere… I think - mathewingram.com/work http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-337600 Congrats to Sphere… I think - mathewingram.com/work Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:36:18 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/#comment-337600 [...] since Tony and his team seem like a great group. Before I added the Sphere plugin to my blog, I tore a strip off the company’s blog search for being irrelevant — and Tony not only took it in stride, [...] [...] since Tony and his team seem like a great group. Before I added the Sphere plugin to my blog, I tore a strip off the company’s blog search for being irrelevant — and Tony not only took it in stride, [...]

]]> By: Spam at Ice Rocket http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-251318 Spam at Ice Rocket Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:05:26 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/#comment-251318 [...] IceRocket.com it was a clean blog tracker. Not the fastest, but cleanest as Mark Cuban explained at Matthew Ingram’s blog some months [...] [...] IceRocket.com it was a clean blog tracker. Not the fastest, but cleanest as Mark Cuban explained at Matthew Ingram’s blog some months [...]

]]> By: Technorati and the blog search wars » mathewingram.com/work http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-243331 Technorati and the blog search wars » mathewingram.com/work Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:25:54 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/#comment-243331 [...] So is Technorati the leader? The charts on Dave’s post look pretty good, although neither Hitwise nor Quantcast are infallible when it comes to measuring such things. But as Zoli Erdos points out, Technorati’s lead over Google may not be as large as it seems, and there is clearly still room for improvement — for example, Google’s blog search indexes comments as well as posts. And as I have written about previously, Sphere and Icerocket have their strengths (and weaknesses) as well. [...] [...] So is Technorati the leader? The charts on Dave’s post look pretty good, although neither Hitwise nor Quantcast are infallible when it comes to measuring such things. But as Zoli Erdos points out, Technorati’s lead over Google may not be as large as it seems, and there is clearly still room for improvement — for example, Google’s blog search indexes comments as well as posts. And as I have written about previously, Sphere and Icerocket have their strengths (and weaknesses) as well. [...]

]]> By: Ajay http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-231045 Ajay Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:48:48 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/28/google-wins-because-it-doesnt-suck/#comment-231045 Tony, thank you for the clarification. Wow, this is what makes blogs so great, that this question could be answered this way. Obviously you're doing something right if all these people highlight your service without being paid to. I think these relevance services are going to be huge so you've certainly picked the right market. Matthew, I never meant to refer to your use of sphere and I understand that you have no financial involvement with them. It's great that you have a forum like this where discussions, like the one taking place in the comments here, can happen and that you don't censor them (I've seen other bloggers do this, which is funny considering their stances on others doing similar stuff). Tony, thank you for the clarification. Wow, this is what makes blogs so great, that this question could be answered this way. Obviously you’re doing something right if all these people highlight your service without being paid to. I think these relevance services are going to be huge so you’ve certainly picked the right market.

Matthew, I never meant to refer to your use of sphere and I understand that you have no financial involvement with them. It’s great that you have a forum like this where discussions, like the one taking place in the comments here, can happen and that you don’t censor them (I’ve seen other bloggers do this, which is funny considering their stances on others doing similar stuff).

]]>