Comments on: Warning: Deep link at your own risk

By: IMR: Extras: HawaiiBlog

IMR: Extras: HawaiiBlog — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

shoppers rushing from store to store to complete their holida… Why so many blogs are just boring. Long term readers of this blog already know that I don’t much care for what Nick Carr has to say. The interesting part is that I don’t like it loya… Warning: Deep link at your own risk When it comes to the Web, it goes without saying that being able to link to things is kind of important ? in fact, it?s a little like saying the ab… [IMG [ My Google Reader Shared Items ]] What I’m Seeing

By: Just Shelley

Just Shelley — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

deep linking” into any page of a website. Take away the ability to link and you take away the basic glue that makes the Web work. You’d have no Yahoo (YHOO), no Google (GOOG), no blogs. The point is, there may have been cases that have successfully shown that there is no copyright violation by directly linking to material, but if the defendant in this case did not bring this up in his response or counter-claim, it won’t be considered in court. It is not the court

By: Canadian Blogs

Canadian Blogs — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Warning: Deep link at your own risk via Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work December 22nd, 2006 at 22:43

By: Planet Identity

Planet Identity — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

broken. A 2000 case established the legality of “deep linking” into any page of a website. Take away the ability to link and you take away the basic glue that makes the Web work. You’d have no Yahoo (YHOO), no Google (GOOG), no blogs. The point is, there may have been cases that have successfully shown that there is no copyright violation by directly linking to material, but if the defendant in this case did not bring this up in his response or counter-claim, it won’t be considered in court. It is not the court’s