<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Digg getting better, or worse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:19:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-113227</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/#comment-113227</guid>
		<description>My biggest issue is the commenters. I like the quote from the lifehacker people that describes online communities:

â€œAlso, netiquette in public forums has a lot to do with the content around which the community is centered. Lifehackerâ€™s posts set out to help folks, so in kind, our readers want to help us and each other back. Digg is a popularity contest of oneupmanship. Gawker is all about making fun of things, so its readers mock each other and it right back in the comments. Karmaâ€™s a boomerang.â€

but I can&#039;t help but notice that Lifehacker also restricts who can comment. :)

I wrote on the subject of trolls today, nothing that insightful although I did find interesting foreshadowing on the Natali del Conte / TechCrunch split.
http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/the-internet-is-for-trolls/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My biggest issue is the commenters. I like the quote from the lifehacker people that describes online communities:</p>
<p>â€œAlso, netiquette in public forums has a lot to do with the content around which the community is centered. Lifehackerâ€™s posts set out to help folks, so in kind, our readers want to help us and each other back. Digg is a popularity contest of oneupmanship. Gawker is all about making fun of things, so its readers mock each other and it right back in the comments. Karmaâ€™s a boomerang.â€</p>
<p>but I can&#8217;t help but notice that Lifehacker also restricts who can comment. :)</p>
<p>I wrote on the subject of trolls today, nothing that insightful although I did find interesting foreshadowing on the Natali del Conte / TechCrunch split.<br />
<a href="http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/the-internet-is-for-trolls/" rel="nofollow">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/the-internet-is-for-trolls/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-112785</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/#comment-112785</guid>
		<description>I agree, Karoli. There is some good there, but it is often obscured by all of the crap and sophomoric comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Karoli. There is some good there, but it is often obscured by all of the crap and sophomoric comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karoli</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-112621</link>
		<dc:creator>Karoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/#comment-112621</guid>
		<description>I took Digg off my feeds because half their posts were inane and the comments even more so.  It seemed to me that the place was inhabited by high school kids who roved in gangs digging and burying according to how drunk Kevin Rose and Alex Alrecht were on that week&#039;s podcast.  I was a huge fan of both Digg and the podcast for the better part of a year, but as I began to watch the way digg was being gamed and overtaken by trolls, the less I felt like spending time there.

I think Digg is a great concept.  I just don&#039;t think anarchy is an effective way to monitor a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took Digg off my feeds because half their posts were inane and the comments even more so.  It seemed to me that the place was inhabited by high school kids who roved in gangs digging and burying according to how drunk Kevin Rose and Alex Alrecht were on that week&#8217;s podcast.  I was a huge fan of both Digg and the podcast for the better part of a year, but as I began to watch the way digg was being gamed and overtaken by trolls, the less I felt like spending time there.</p>
<p>I think Digg is a great concept.  I just don&#8217;t think anarchy is an effective way to monitor a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Digg getting better or worse? &#187; Netscape.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-112147</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Digg getting better or worse? &#187; Netscape.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/#comment-112147</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] View Story  Discuss (0) (mathewingram.com) 2 minutes ago by msaleem [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] View Story  Discuss (0) (<a href="http://mathewingram.com" title="http://mathewingram.com" target="_blank">mathewingram.com</a>) 2 minutes ago by msaleem [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techmeme</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-112957</link>
		<dc:creator>Techmeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/18/is-digg-getting-better-or-worse/#comment-112957</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Microsoft new facelift, Digg adds video and podcast featuresMathew Ingram / mathewingram.com/work:   Is Digg getting better, or worse?&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Microsoft new facelift, Digg adds video and podcast featuresMathew Ingram / <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work:" title="http://mathewingram.com/work:" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work:</a>   Is Digg getting better, or worse?<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
