<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brain Pickings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SPECIAL: Second Annual Not-So-Much Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-336419</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Pickings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SPECIAL: Second Annual Not-So-Much Awards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-336419</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost.com, ReviewMe.com and SponsoredReviews.com. Then it really escalated: first the FTC stuck a major red flag on it all, then it got as bad as it gets &#8212; Google spanked the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://PayPerPost.com" title="http://PayPerPost.com" target="_blank">PayPerPost.com</a>, <a href="http://ReviewMe.com" title="http://ReviewMe.com" target="_blank">ReviewMe.com</a> and <a href="http://SponsoredReviews.com" title="http://SponsoredReviews.com" target="_blank">SponsoredReviews.com</a>. Then it really escalated: first the FTC stuck a major red flag on it all, then it got as bad as it gets &#8212; Google spanked the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaysinism.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say NO to PayPerPost!!</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-302564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaysinism.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Say NO to PayPerPost!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-302564</guid>
		<description>[...] FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey Bloggers, PayPerPost is Illegal &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-291734</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey Bloggers, PayPerPost is Illegal &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-291734</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloggers, PayPerPost is&#160;Illegal  Matthew Ingram and Tony Hung go into it in more detail, but the FCC FTC has made a ruling on schemes (like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloggers, PayPerPost is&nbsp;Illegal  Matthew Ingram and Tony Hung go into it in more detail, but the FCC FTC has made a ruling on schemes (like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; New FTC Position May Force Changes For PayPerPost and Affiliate Marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-112284</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; New FTC Position May Force Changes For PayPerPost and Affiliate Marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-112284</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work :  December 12th, 2006 at 6:10 pm &#124; Permalink [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] FTC tells PayPerPost to knock it off &raquo; Mathew Ingram: <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work" title="http://mathewingram.com/work" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work</a> :  December 12th, 2006 at 6:10 pm | Permalink [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finally, PayPerPost changes its tune &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-110898</link>
		<dc:creator>Finally, PayPerPost changes its tune &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/12/12/ftc-tells-payperpost-to-knock-it-off/#comment-110898</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s not clear whether this change has come about because PayPerPost decided its initial policy was wrong, or because it wasn&#8217;t getting enough uptake among bloggers or advertisers, or because of the recent FTC ruling on word-of-mouth marketing and the requirement to disclose, which I wrote about here. It&#8217;s possible that it was a combination of all the above. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not clear whether this change has come about because PayPerPost decided its initial policy was wrong, or because it wasn&#8217;t getting enough uptake among bloggers or advertisers, or because of the recent FTC ruling on word-of-mouth marketing and the requirement to disclose, which I wrote about here. It&#8217;s possible that it was a combination of all the above. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
