<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Rutledge thinks you&#8217;re a moron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbrenkley</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-375061</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbrenkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/#comment-375061</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Andy Rutledge thinks he&#039;s beyond everyone else. What a shock he&#039;s gonna have when he wakes up and realizes he&#039;s just as much part of the crowd as everyone else is. Nice effort in trying to set yourself apart Andy, but crowds are ultimately made up of individuals too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Andy Rutledge thinks he&#39;s beyond everyone else. What a shock he&#39;s gonna have when he wakes up and realizes he&#39;s just as much part of the crowd as everyone else is. Nice effort in trying to set yourself apart Andy, but crowds are ultimately made up of individuals too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbrenkley</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-373461</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbrenkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/#comment-373461</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Andy Rutledge thinks he&#039;s beyond everyone else. What a shock he&#039;s gonna have when he wakes up and realizes he&#039;s just as much part of the crowd as everyone else is. Nice effort in trying to set yourself apart Andy, but crowds are ultimately made up of individuals too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Andy Rutledge thinks he&#39;s beyond everyone else. What a shock he&#39;s gonna have when he wakes up and realizes he&#39;s just as much part of the crowd as everyone else is. Nice effort in trying to set yourself apart Andy, but crowds are ultimately made up of individuals too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-343757</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/#comment-343757</guid>
		<description>This is an old post, but I figured I&#039;d add what I could.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s also really easy to attack him for pushing the discredited &quot;great man&quot; hypothesis -- that there are individuals out there who create works of genius in isolation -- ignoring the fact that these works are the culmination of countless conversations, arguments, and myriad other social interactions with the minds of others that the so-called &quot;geniuses&quot; had.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once you understand the true pedigree of brilliant ideas, &quot;Web 2.0&quot; does nothing if not enhance the probability of instances of brilliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an old post, but I figured I&#39;d add what I could.</p>
<p>It&#39;s also really easy to attack him for pushing the discredited &#8220;great man&#8221; hypothesis &#8212; that there are individuals out there who create works of genius in isolation &#8212; ignoring the fact that these works are the culmination of countless conversations, arguments, and myriad other social interactions with the minds of others that the so-called &#8220;geniuses&#8221; had.</p>
<p>Once you understand the true pedigree of brilliant ideas, &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; does nothing if not enhance the probability of instances of brilliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Digg &#8212; worthless, or just misunderstood?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-99277</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Digg &#8212; worthless, or just misunderstood?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/#comment-99277</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason says that the Digg community is &#8220;rotting from the inside out,&#8221; and that &#8220;the sheer level of superiority, sarcasm, and general negativity is overwhelming.&#8221; As with many other critics of the Digg model, or social media in general &#8212; including Nick Carr and Andrew Keen, as well as newcomers Andy Rutledge, who I&#8217;ve written about here, and Lee Gomes of the Wall Street Journal, who I&#8217;ve written about here &#8212; the argument is that the wisdom of crowds doesn&#8217;t exist. The problem with the whole concept of taking advantage of the &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221; is that crowds have no wisdom. Microsoft Windows is an example of an operating system written using the wisdom of crowds&#8230; and don&#8217;t get me started on the majority of large open-source efforts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason says that the Digg community is &#8220;rotting from the inside out,&#8221; and that &#8220;the sheer level of superiority, sarcasm, and general negativity is overwhelming.&#8221; As with many other critics of the Digg model, or social media in general &#8212; including Nick Carr and Andrew Keen, as well as newcomers Andy Rutledge, who I&#8217;ve written about here, and Lee Gomes of the Wall Street Journal, who I&#8217;ve written about here &#8212; the argument is that the wisdom of crowds doesn&#8217;t exist. The problem with the whole concept of taking advantage of the &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221; is that crowds have no wisdom. Microsoft Windows is an example of an operating system written using the wisdom of crowds&#8230; and don&#8217;t get me started on the majority of large open-source efforts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg &#8212; worthless, or just misunderstood? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-99260</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg &#8212; worthless, or just misunderstood? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/11/29/andy-rutledge-thinks-youre-a-moron/#comment-99260</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason says that the Digg community is &#8220;rotting from the inside out,&#8221; and that &#8220;the sheer level of superiority, sarcasm, and general negativity is overwhelming.&#8221; As with many other critics of the Digg model, or social media in general &#8212; including Nick Carr and Andrew Keen, as well as newcomers Andy Rutledge, who I&#8217;ve written about here, and Lee Gomes of the Wall Street Journal, who I&#8217;ve written about here &#8212; the argument is that the wisdom of crowds doesn&#8217;t exist. The problem with the whole concept of taking advantage of the &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221; is that crowds have no wisdom. Microsoft Windows is an example of an operating system written using the wisdom of crowds&#8230; and don&#8217;t get me started on the majority of large open-source efforts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason says that the Digg community is &#8220;rotting from the inside out,&#8221; and that &#8220;the sheer level of superiority, sarcasm, and general negativity is overwhelming.&#8221; As with many other critics of the Digg model, or social media in general &#8212; including Nick Carr and Andrew Keen, as well as newcomers Andy Rutledge, who I&#8217;ve written about here, and Lee Gomes of the Wall Street Journal, who I&#8217;ve written about here &#8212; the argument is that the wisdom of crowds doesn&#8217;t exist. The problem with the whole concept of taking advantage of the &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221; is that crowds have no wisdom. Microsoft Windows is an example of an operating system written using the wisdom of crowds&#8230; and don&#8217;t get me started on the majority of large open-source efforts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

