<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike gets all medieval on PayPerPost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayPerPost Is Now Officially Absurd</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-179853</link>
		<dc:creator>PayPerPost Is Now Officially Absurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/#comment-179853</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Mike gets all medieval on PayPerPost &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Mike gets all medieval on PayPerPost &raquo; Mathew Ingram: <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work" title="http://mathewingram.com/work" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work</a> [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrington is now officially an asshole at odd time signatures</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-77481</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrington is now officially an asshole at odd time signatures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/#comment-77481</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Matthew Ingram thinks Arrington is letting his hatred of PPP get the better of him. Teresa Valdez Klein thinks there&#8217;s room to develop best practices around PayPerPost. Over at Blogher, Jeneane Sessum doesn&#8217;t think we need the Transparency Police. Shane Ede (thatedeguy) agrees. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Matthew Ingram thinks Arrington is letting his hatred of PPP get the better of him. Teresa Valdez Klein thinks there&#8217;s room to develop best practices around PayPerPost. Over at Blogher, Jeneane Sessum doesn&#8217;t think we need the Transparency Police. Shane Ede (thatedeguy) agrees. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brilliant Marketing from PayPerPost &#187; Mitchelaneous</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-77429</link>
		<dc:creator>Brilliant Marketing from PayPerPost &#187; Mitchelaneous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/#comment-77429</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Related Reading: + PayPerPost is now Officially Absurd + TechCrunch Promotes PayPerPost again, unintentionally + Mike gets all medieval on PayPerPost + PayPerPost creates DisclosurePolicy, TechCrunch calls it absurd? + PayPerPost launches DisclosurePolicy.org    Tags: PayPerPost, TechCrunch, trolls, ideas, feedback, press, marketing October 31st, 2006 at 04:16 pm [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Related Reading: + PayPerPost is now Officially Absurd + TechCrunch Promotes PayPerPost again, unintentionally + Mike gets all medieval on PayPerPost + PayPerPost creates DisclosurePolicy, TechCrunch calls it absurd? + PayPerPost launches <a href="http://DisclosurePolicy.org" title="http://DisclosurePolicy.org" target="_blank">DisclosurePolicy.org</a>    Tags: PayPerPost, TechCrunch, trolls, ideas, feedback, press, marketing October 31st, 2006 at 04:16 pm [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-77110</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/#comment-77110</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point, Ed. It&#039;s all about the links -- and I think that&#039;s why what Matt is doing is inherently misleading, regardless of whether the post is positive or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, Ed. It&#8217;s all about the links &#8212; and I think that&#8217;s why what Matt is doing is inherently misleading, regardless of whether the post is positive or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/comment-page-1/#comment-77093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/mike-gets-all-medieval-on-payperpost/#comment-77093</guid>
		<description>I really think that disclosure is vital if you&#039;re using, or thinking about using PPP.  However a quick line at the start or end of the post &quot;this post was sponsored by XXX&quot; would be enough (iin my eyes).

The thing about PPP is that it doesn&#039;t sell reviews, it sells links. The reviews (positive, negative or neutral) are a (sometimes) beneficial side effect.

Ed

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think that disclosure is vital if you&#8217;re using, or thinking about using PPP.  However a quick line at the start or end of the post &#8220;this post was sponsored by XXX&#8221; would be enough (iin my eyes).</p>
<p>The thing about PPP is that it doesn&#8217;t sell reviews, it sells links. The reviews (positive, negative or neutral) are a (sometimes) beneficial side effect.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

