<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google flirting with the e-word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google: 3 strikes and counting &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/comment-page-1/#comment-262177</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google: 3 strikes and counting &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/#comment-262177</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram: &#8220;Is Google flirting with the e-word?&#8221;:&#160;  Who is helping comScore put this little package together? Why, your friend Google.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram: &ldquo;Is Google flirting with the e-word?&rdquo;:&nbsp;  Who is helping comScore put this little package together? Why, your friend Google.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free RAZR cell phone</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/comment-page-1/#comment-83024</link>
		<dc:creator>free RAZR cell phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/#comment-83024</guid>
		<description>i got a free razr from this website and thought i would share :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got a free razr from this website and thought i would share :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google: 3 strikes and counting &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/comment-page-1/#comment-76139</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google: 3 strikes and counting &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/#comment-76139</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Mathew Ingram: &#8220;Is Google flirting with the e-word?&#8221;:&#160;  Who is helping comScore put this little package together? Why, your friend Google.&#160; [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Mathew Ingram: &ldquo;Is Google flirting with the e-word?&rdquo;:&nbsp;  Who is helping comScore put this little package together? Why, your friend Google.&nbsp; [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/comment-page-1/#comment-76058</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/#comment-76058</guid>
		<description>What would worry me more would be if, having looked at a Volvo web page and been &quot;cookied&quot;, and then Google figured out an algorithm to track every other vehicle manufacturer whose page I visited. Would be a gold mine of competitive information that any vendor would lust for. However, that would be a definite invasion of privacy.

As an aside, having been a Volvo owner since 1972, I don&#039;t think there is much Volvo could learn about me by tracking me on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would worry me more would be if, having looked at a Volvo web page and been &#8220;cookied&#8221;, and then Google figured out an algorithm to track every other vehicle manufacturer whose page I visited. Would be a gold mine of competitive information that any vendor would lust for. However, that would be a definite invasion of privacy.</p>
<p>As an aside, having been a Volvo owner since 1972, I don&#8217;t think there is much Volvo could learn about me by tracking me on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/comment-page-1/#comment-75802</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/28/is-google-flirting-with-the-e-word/#comment-75802</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Ryan and Peter.  I think you both touched on the hard part, which is using personal information to make ads more relevant but without crossing a line and abusing people&#039;s privacy.  That&#039;s the Holy Grail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Ryan and Peter.  I think you both touched on the hard part, which is using personal information to make ads more relevant but without crossing a line and abusing people&#8217;s privacy.  That&#8217;s the Holy Grail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

