<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does being transparent ruin a PR blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-176726</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-176726</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers   By Mathew Ingram  Expert Author  Article Date: 2006-10-30  We all know that marketers are targeting bloggers, hoping to get some word-of-mouth going.  And it seems they are going after mommy bloggers in particular, no doubt influenced by recent stats that say most moms prefer receiving advice about products from other moms. Here's an anecdote that appeared in Saturday's National Post from the recent Motherlode conference in Toronto, where Jen Lawrence of MUBAR (Mothered Up Beyond All Recognition) spoke.When she wrote a wry post about the idiocy of Tom Cruise, her blog hit the mainstream and she was deluged: "Would I be interested in sampling a baby blanket worth several hundred dollars? Would I be interested in offering my readers access to exclusive [advertising] content? Would I like two tickets to the sold-out show of my daughter's favourite TV character?   According to the story, Ms. Lawrence - a former banker turned blogger - says "the extent to which these blogs are becoming commercial ventures should give pause to the mothers who turn to them for sage counsel": "It is an open and honest medium with such great potential for community-building and I just hate the idea that marketers are actively trying to infiltrate our conversations."Throughout the blogosphere, the same conundrum keeps cropping up. Blogs are a direct conduit to people who care about a particular subject, and the fact that they are open and honest also makes them tremendously appealing to marketers, who naturally want to hitch a ride on all that openness. But then marketing - particularly if done badly (see the Edelman-Wal Mart controversy) inevitably detracts from the very things that make blogs powerful in the first place. It's a Catch-22. Of course, Rob Hyndman says that blogs aren't always as honest as we might want to think they are. Add to  Del.icio.us &#124;  Digg &#124; Reddit &#124;  Furl Bookmark WebProNews:    About the Author:Mathew Ingram [note only one "t" in Mathew] is a technology writer and blogger for the Globe and Mail, a national newspaper based in Toronto, and also writes about the Web and media at www.mathewingram.com/work and www.mathewingram.com/media. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers   By Mathew Ingram  Expert Author  Article Date: 2006-10-30  We all know that marketers are targeting bloggers, hoping to get some word-of-mouth going.  And it seems they are going after mommy bloggers in particular, no doubt influenced by recent stats that say most moms prefer receiving advice about products from other moms. Here&#8217;s an anecdote that appeared in Saturday&#8217;s National Post from the recent Motherlode conference in Toronto, where Jen Lawrence of MUBAR (Mothered Up Beyond All Recognition) spoke.When she wrote a wry post about the idiocy of Tom Cruise, her blog hit the mainstream and she was deluged: &#8220;Would I be interested in sampling a baby blanket worth several hundred dollars? Would I be interested in offering my readers access to exclusive [advertising] content? Would I like two tickets to the sold-out show of my daughter&#8217;s favourite TV character?   According to the story, Ms. Lawrence - a former banker turned blogger - says &#8220;the extent to which these blogs are becoming commercial ventures should give pause to the mothers who turn to them for sage counsel&#8221;: &#8220;It is an open and honest medium with such great potential for community-building and I just hate the idea that marketers are actively trying to infiltrate our conversations.&#8221;Throughout the blogosphere, the same conundrum keeps cropping up. Blogs are a direct conduit to people who care about a particular subject, and the fact that they are open and honest also makes them tremendously appealing to marketers, who naturally want to hitch a ride on all that openness. But then marketing - particularly if done badly (see the Edelman-Wal Mart controversy) inevitably detracts from the very things that make blogs powerful in the first place. It&#8217;s a Catch-22. Of course, Rob Hyndman says that blogs aren&#8217;t always as honest as we might want to think they are. Add to  <a href="http://Del.icio.us" title="http://Del.icio.us" target="_blank">Del.icio.us</a> |  Digg | Reddit |  Furl Bookmark WebProNews:    About the Author:Mathew Ingram [note only one "t" in Mathew] is a technology writer and blogger for the Globe and Mail, a national newspaper based in Toronto, and also writes about the Web and media at <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewingram.com/work</a> and <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/media" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewingram.com/media</a>. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon H</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-108371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-108371</guid>
		<description>The reputation of the PR profession is at an all-time low because so many journalists, bloggers and consumers view it as propaganda or spin. But companies are waking up to the realization that effective participation in the world of consumer-generated media (where their brands are defined) must be transparent, open and honest. The Wal-Mart Edelman fiasco demonstrates the incredible downside to manipulative PR. Companies embracing higher standards of communications ethics will be richly rewarded in the marketplace. More at http://jon8332.typepad.com/force_for_good/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reputation of the PR profession is at an all-time low because so many journalists, bloggers and consumers view it as propaganda or spin. But companies are waking up to the realization that effective participation in the world of consumer-generated media (where their brands are defined) must be transparent, open and honest. The Wal-Mart Edelman fiasco demonstrates the incredible downside to manipulative PR. Companies embracing higher standards of communications ethics will be richly rewarded in the marketplace. More at <a href="http://jon8332.typepad.com/force_for_good/" rel="nofollow">http://jon8332.typepad.com/force_for_good/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbasturea - www</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-82997</link>
		<dc:creator>cbasturea - www</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-82997</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] posted to newpr by  cbasturea Oct 24  Comment &#187;        10    promote +3 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] posted to newpr by  cbasturea Oct 24  Comment &#187;        10    promote +3 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-76719</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketers Going After Mommy Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-76719</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] We all know that marketers are targeting bloggers, hoping to get some word-of-mouth going.   And it seems they are going after mommy bloggers in particular, no doubt influenced by recent stats that say most moms prefer receiving advice about products from other moms. Here's an anecdote that appeared in Saturday's National Post from the recent Motherlode conference in Toronto, where Jen Lawrence of MUBAR (Mothered Up Beyond All Recognition) spoke.When she wrote a wry post about the idiocy of Tom Cruise, her blog hit the mainstream and she was deluged: "Would I be interested in sampling a baby blanket worth several hundred dollars? Would I be interested in offering my readers access to exclusive [advertising] content? Would I like two tickets to the sold-out show of my daughter's favourite TV character?   According to the story, Ms. Lawrence - a former banker turned blogger - says "the extent to which these blogs are becoming commercial ventures should give pause to the mothers who turn to them for sage counsel": "It is an open and honest medium with such great potential for community-building and I just hate the idea that marketers are actively trying to infiltrate our conversations."Throughout the blogosphere, the same conundrum keeps cropping up. Blogs are a direct conduit to people who care about a particular subject, and the fact that they are open and honest also makes them tremendously appealing to marketers, who naturally want to hitch a ride on all that openness. But then marketing - particularly if done badly (see the Edelman-Wal Mart controversy) inevitably detracts from the very things that make blogs powerful in the first place. It's a Catch-22. Of course, Rob Hyndman says that blogs aren't always as honest as we might want to think they are. Add to  Del.icio.us &#124;  Digg &#124; Reddit &#124;  Furl Bookmark WebProNews: View All Articles by Mathew Ingram   Receive Our Daily Email of Breaking eBusiness News    About the Author:  Mathew Ingram [note only one "t" in Mathew] is a technology writer and blogger for the Globe and Mail, a national newspaper based in Toronto, and also writes about the Web and media at www.mathewingram.com/work and www.mathewingram.com/media.   WebProNews RSS Feed More Blog Talk Articles  Contact WebProNews [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] We all know that marketers are targeting bloggers, hoping to get some word-of-mouth going.   And it seems they are going after mommy bloggers in particular, no doubt influenced by recent stats that say most moms prefer receiving advice about products from other moms. Here&#8217;s an anecdote that appeared in Saturday&#8217;s National Post from the recent Motherlode conference in Toronto, where Jen Lawrence of MUBAR (Mothered Up Beyond All Recognition) spoke.When she wrote a wry post about the idiocy of Tom Cruise, her blog hit the mainstream and she was deluged: &#8220;Would I be interested in sampling a baby blanket worth several hundred dollars? Would I be interested in offering my readers access to exclusive [advertising] content? Would I like two tickets to the sold-out show of my daughter&#8217;s favourite TV character?   According to the story, Ms. Lawrence - a former banker turned blogger - says &#8220;the extent to which these blogs are becoming commercial ventures should give pause to the mothers who turn to them for sage counsel&#8221;: &#8220;It is an open and honest medium with such great potential for community-building and I just hate the idea that marketers are actively trying to infiltrate our conversations.&#8221;Throughout the blogosphere, the same conundrum keeps cropping up. Blogs are a direct conduit to people who care about a particular subject, and the fact that they are open and honest also makes them tremendously appealing to marketers, who naturally want to hitch a ride on all that openness. But then marketing - particularly if done badly (see the Edelman-Wal Mart controversy) inevitably detracts from the very things that make blogs powerful in the first place. It&#8217;s a Catch-22. Of course, Rob Hyndman says that blogs aren&#8217;t always as honest as we might want to think they are. Add to  <a href="http://Del.icio.us" title="http://Del.icio.us" target="_blank">Del.icio.us</a> |  Digg | Reddit |  Furl Bookmark WebProNews: View All Articles by Mathew Ingram   Receive Our Daily Email of Breaking eBusiness News    About the Author:  Mathew Ingram [note only one "t" in Mathew] is a technology writer and blogger for the Globe and Mail, a national newspaper based in Toronto, and also writes about the Web and media at <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewingram.com/work</a> and <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/media" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewingram.com/media</a>.   WebProNews RSS Feed More Blog Talk Articles  Contact WebProNews [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mommy bloggers marketing pile-on &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-75794</link>
		<dc:creator>Mommy bloggers marketing pile-on &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/20/does-being-transparent-ruin-a-pr-blog/#comment-75794</guid>
		<description>[...] with del.icio.us &#160; &#124; &#160; Email this entry  &#160; &#124; &#160; TrackBack URI &#160; &#124; &#160; Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; &#124; &#160; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with <a href="http://del.icio.us" title="http://del.icio.us" target="_blank">del.icio.us</a> &nbsp; | &nbsp; Email this entry  &nbsp; | &nbsp; TrackBack URI &nbsp; | &nbsp; Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; Cosmos      Click here forcopyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
