<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Apple has a worm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jobs&#8217; reality-distortion field still intact &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-156009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobs&#8217; reality-distortion field still intact &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/#comment-156009</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, it&#8217;s possible that everyone is willing to overlook the Apple case because a) they are tired of the whole options-backdating issue, b) they don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really that important &#8212; or even wrong, as my friend Rob argued in the comments on my previous post &#8212; or c) the company has absolved Jobs of any direct liablity, and therefore the whole issue is effectively closed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, it&#8217;s possible that everyone is willing to overlook the Apple case because a) they are tired of the whole options-backdating issue, b) they don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really that important &#8212; or even wrong, as my friend Rob argued in the comments on my previous post &#8212; or c) the company has absolved Jobs of any direct liablity, and therefore the whole issue is effectively closed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google provides options on its options &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-106453</link>
		<dc:creator>Google provides options on its options &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/#comment-106453</guid>
		<description>[...] Bearish signal or not, I think it&#8217;s a great idea. One of the difficult issues with stock options &#8212; apart from the fact that companies hand them out like candy and then allow executives to reprice and extend them at will, which I&#8217;ve discussed here &#8212; is arriving at a value for them. Since they only really have value in the future when they are exerciseable, it takes a fair bit of hoop-jumping to arrive at a current value, which quite quickly gets into Black-Scholes pricing theory, etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bearish signal or not, I think it&#8217;s a great idea. One of the difficult issues with stock options &#8212; apart from the fact that companies hand them out like candy and then allow executives to reprice and extend them at will, which I&#8217;ve discussed here &#8212; is arriving at a value for them. Since they only really have value in the future when they are exerciseable, it takes a fair bit of hoop-jumping to arrive at a current value, which quite quickly gets into Black-Scholes pricing theory, etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-68646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/#comment-68646</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John.  But I always win -- it&#039;s my blog, so I always get the last word   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John.  But I always win &#8212; it&#8217;s my blog, so I always get the last word   :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koetsier</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-68370</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koetsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/#comment-68370</guid>
		<description>Sometimes you just can&#039;t win, Matthew.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you just can&#8217;t win, Matthew.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/comment-page-1/#comment-68245</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/18/this-apple-has-a-worm/#comment-68245</guid>
		<description>Hey Eric -- did you even read the six comments or so before your latest one? I guess I spent all that time arguing with Rob in a pathetic attempt to drive traffic too, right? In fact, he&#039;s probably in on it! Man, you sure have me figured out. I should know better than to try and pull one over on you, buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eric &#8212; did you even read the six comments or so before your latest one? I guess I spent all that time arguing with Rob in a pathetic attempt to drive traffic too, right? In fact, he&#8217;s probably in on it! Man, you sure have me figured out. I should know better than to try and pull one over on you, buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
