<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why isn&#8217;t this on Techmeme?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Media geeks: Techmeme is hiring &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-344105</link>
		<dc:creator>Media geeks: Techmeme is hiring &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/#comment-344105</guid>
		<description>[...] How does it work? Only Gabe knows for sure, which drives some people around the bend. I know that I&#8217;ve been fascinated with the way Techmeme functions ever since I first laid eyes on it a couple of years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How does it work? Only Gabe knows for sure, which drives some people around the bend. I know that I&#8217;ve been fascinated with the way Techmeme functions ever since I first laid eyes on it a couple of years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman takes ownership of Wal-Mart blunder &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-66392</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman takes ownership of Wal-Mart blunder &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/#comment-66392</guid>
		<description>[...] Why isn&#039;t this on Techmeme? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why isn&#8217;t this on Techmeme? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-66288</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Edelman drop the ball on Wal-Mart? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/#comment-66288</guid>
		<description>[...] Why isn&#039;t this on Techmeme? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why isn&#8217;t this on Techmeme? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurry vision for Wal-Mart blog &#124; News.blog &#124; CNET News.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-66174</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurry vision for Wal-Mart blog &#124; News.blog &#124; CNET News.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/#comment-66174</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Blog community response:  &quot;Edelman wanted to make consumers think that Wal-Mart is a hip place that you&#039;d want to use as the anchor point for a roadtrip. The problem is it&#039;s not. And because blogging is not a control-based medium, Edelman couldn&#039;t make Wal-Mart appear to be something it&#039;s not. It rang false, and they got caught.&quot; --Publishing 2.0 &quot;I suppose the take home message is that if you&#039;re going to sponsor a blog either be completely transparent all the way - risking the authenticity of the message, but perhaps done in a &#039;wink-wink&#039; fashion.&quot; --Deep Jive Interests &quot;This doesn&#039;t just cause confusion by blurring the lines between blogging and payola, or blog-vertising, but it arguably does Edelman harm too - and that would be a shame, since they are the PR firm that probably walks the walk the most when it comes to blogging and the conversation (the Wal-Marting Across America blog has a post that puts all the blame on Wal-Mart haters).&quot; --Mathew Ingram [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Blog community response:  &#8220;Edelman wanted to make consumers think that Wal-Mart is a hip place that you&#8217;d want to use as the anchor point for a roadtrip. The problem is it&#8217;s not. And because blogging is not a control-based medium, Edelman couldn&#8217;t make Wal-Mart appear to be something it&#8217;s not. It rang false, and they got caught.&#8221; &#8211;Publishing 2.0 &#8220;I suppose the take home message is that if you&#8217;re going to sponsor a blog either be completely transparent all the way &#8211; risking the authenticity of the message, but perhaps done in a &#8216;wink-wink&#8217; fashion.&#8221; &#8211;Deep Jive Interests &#8220;This doesn&#8217;t just cause confusion by blurring the lines between blogging and payola, or blog-vertising, but it arguably does Edelman harm too &#8211; and that would be a shame, since they are the PR firm that probably walks the walk the most when it comes to blogging and the conversation (the Wal-Marting Across America blog has a post that puts all the blame on Wal-Mart haters).&#8221; &#8211;Mathew Ingram [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edelman, Wal-Mart, Steve Rubel: head, meet sand at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-66020</link>
		<dc:creator>Edelman, Wal-Mart, Steve Rubel: head, meet sand at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/15/why-isnt-this-on-techmeme/#comment-66020</guid>
		<description>[...] Consequences: blowback This will hit TechMeme, and the consequences could be severe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consequences: blowback This will hit TechMeme, and the consequences could be severe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
