Comments on: News flash: Dave and Nick are both right http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Bloganas in Pyjamas « tumbleblog http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/comment-page-1/#comment-65951 Bloganas in Pyjamas « tumbleblog Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:29:25 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/#comment-65951 [...] News flash: Dave and Nick are both right » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work The message being (I assume) that real journalists get killed and bloggers sit around in their pyjamas. [...] [...] News flash: Dave and Nick are both right » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work The message being (I assume) that real journalists get killed and bloggers sit around in their pyjamas. [...]

]]> By: Mathew Ingram http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/comment-page-1/#comment-65858 Mathew Ingram Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:08:00 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/#comment-65858 Thanks for the comment, Seth. Although I think we may disagree on how much there is, I would agree that gatekeeping occurs -- see the post right after this one about Edelman and Wal-Mart and the lack of coverage it has gotten in the A-list. That's human nature, to some extent. Thanks for the comment, Seth. Although I think we may disagree on how much there is, I would agree that gatekeeping occurs — see the post right after this one about Edelman and Wal-Mart and the lack of coverage it has gotten in the A-list. That’s human nature, to some extent.

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/comment-page-1/#comment-65812 Seth Finkelstein Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:48:52 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/14/news-flash-dave-and-nick-are-both-right/#comment-65812 The fallacy is the vision of the quasi-commune. I keep asking, what's so great about being an unpaid stringer? What's so superultrafantastic that you can be a freelancer for no money (or Google Ads pennies)? What happens is that a gatekeeping structure develops where there's a few voices heard, and everyone else. Yes, it's possible for someone to be in the right place at the right time and get a big break in terms of attention that way - I heard it, I don't need that repeated. But so what? Again, a big problem is an almost pathlogical denial of a gatekeeping system, in the fact of manifest evidence from the Power Law in the abstract, to the practice that the same Big Heads in the bogosphere get attention for saying the same things over and over. [anti-snark - I've said all this before too, that's my cross to bear] The fallacy is the vision of the quasi-commune. I keep asking, what’s so great about being an unpaid stringer? What’s so superultrafantastic that you can be a freelancer for no money (or Google Ads pennies)?

What happens is that a gatekeeping structure develops where there’s a few voices heard, and everyone else. Yes, it’s possible for someone to be in the right place at the right time and get a big break in terms of attention that way – I heard it, I don’t need that repeated. But so what?

Again, a big problem is an almost pathlogical denial of a gatekeeping system, in the fact of manifest evidence from the Power Law in the abstract, to the practice that the same Big Heads in the bogosphere get attention for saying the same things over and over.

[anti-snark - I've said all this before too, that's my cross to bear]

]]>