<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what&#8217;s next for YouTube?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podonomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Shows Infotainment is King, Not Content</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-64195</link>
		<dc:creator>Podonomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Shows Infotainment is King, Not Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/#comment-64195</guid>
		<description>[...] However, I can&#8217;t ignore Google&#8217;s billion dollar purchase of YouTube. This is just a significant watershed moment in the technology field. Debbie Weil said it best when she called the Google acquisition of YouTube an inflection point. Mathew Ingram wrote that Google&#8217;s purchase of YouTube will make &#8220;old media&#8221; finally realize that user generated media is NOT a fad. Some, like Jon Watson, have questioned why Google would make this purchase in the first place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, I can&#8217;t ignore Google&#8217;s billion dollar purchase of YouTube. This is just a significant watershed moment in the technology field. Debbie Weil said it best when she called the Google acquisition of YouTube an inflection point. Mathew Ingram wrote that Google&#8217;s purchase of YouTube will make &#8220;old media&#8221; finally realize that user generated media is NOT a fad. Some, like Jon Watson, have questioned why Google would make this purchase in the first place. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-64128</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/#comment-64128</guid>
		<description>How many class A shares in Google does E Schmidt own, now?

http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&amp;CIK=0001288776&amp;owner=include&amp;count=40</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many class A shares in Google does E Schmidt own, now?</p>
<p><a href="http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&#038;CIK=0001288776&#038;owner=include&#038;count=40" rel="nofollow">http://sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&#038;CIK=0001288776&#038;owner=include&#038;count=40</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet News</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-65668</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/10/so-whats-next-for-youtube/#comment-65668</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Agrawal, professor of strategic management at the University of Toronto&#039;s Rotman School of Management, warns that YouTube now faces the liabilities of a publicly traded company, notably liability for copyright infringement.&quot;  Also, Matthew Ingram - So what&#039;s next for YouTube? (Oct 10) - Ingram and others see trouble ahead.  &quot;One of the lingering issues Google has to confront now is what happens to YouTube if it canÂ’t manage to convince the networks to let it use their material. Does it take it all down, or wait until it&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Agrawal, professor of strategic management at the University of Toronto&#8217;s Rotman School of Management, warns that YouTube now faces the liabilities of a publicly traded company, notably liability for copyright infringement.&#8221;  Also, Matthew Ingram &#8211; So what&#8217;s next for YouTube? (Oct 10) &#8211; Ingram and others see trouble ahead.  &#8220;One of the lingering issues Google has to confront now is what happens to YouTube if it canÂ’t manage to convince the networks to let it use their material. Does it take it all down, or wait until it<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

