http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:47:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/comment-page-1/#comment-59757 22 Sep 2006 - UK Developer Blogs - Developer Fusion, the UK developer community - VB, ASP, C#, .NET, PHP and XML tutorials & source code Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:57:20 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/#comment-59757 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Edit: check out Mathew Ingram's post on the Techcrush issue; he also links to related posts from Kent Newsome and Shelley Powers. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Edit: check out Mathew Ingram’s post on the Techcrush issue; he also links to related posts from Kent Newsome and Shelley Powers. [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/comment-page-1/#comment-53403 CrunchNotes » The Real Story About TechCrush Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:16:28 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/#comment-53403 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Comments on this story TechCrush a non-issue, move along, please, move along… « nerdflood, September 22nd, 2006 […] Hey, did you hear that there’s actually no legal action attempting to derail TechCrush before they have even had a chance to get some content out. It’s true! Apparently, Mike Arrington did NOT send out some vitrolic cease and desist letter. It was more like a nice, professional email suggesting that TechCrush might be infringing on a trademark or two, and hey, wouldn’t it be nice if we could just sit down and talk about our options. It looks as though an agreement was happily and amicably reached: mid day, Sept 21: I speak with my lawyer. we discuss asking them to put a disclaimer on the site that they aren’t affiliated with techcrunch. I send an email to Lutz that says “Hey Lutz, Spoke to my lawyer at length today. How about a statement somewhere, preferably in the header area, that simply says you aren’t affiliated with TechCrunch in any way? If that doesn’t work for you, let’s keep talking…and there is no need to stop posting on the site…looking forward to more good content. Mike” […] Deep Jive Interests » TechCrunch Trademark Tiff Ends Amicably; TechCrunch Lawyers Working Furiously To Secure Trademark?, September 22nd, 2006 […] Mr. Arrington also posted recently: mid day, Sept 21: I speak with my lawyer. we discuss asking them to put a disclaimer on the site that they aren’t affiliated with techcrunch. I send an email to Lutz that says “Hey Lutz, Spoke to my lawyer at length today. How about a statement somewhere, preferably in the header area, that simply says you aren’t affiliated with TechCrunch in any way? If that doesn’t work for you, let’s keep talking…and there is no need to stop posting on the site…looking forward to more good content. Mike” […] Mike should lay off TechCrush — and Dead 2.0 » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work, September 22nd, 2006 […] Mike has posted a chronology of events here. Still seems kind of pissed at Stowe Boyd. […] :Ben Metcalfe Blog » Blog Archive » Michael Arrington sets the record straight on TechCrush, September 22nd, 2006 […] Micheal has set the record straight (at least from his perspective) by setting out the string of events that have occurred around this issue. […] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Comments on this story TechCrush a non-issue, move along, please, move along… « nerdflood, September 22nd, 2006 […] Hey, did you hear that there’s actually no legal action attempting to derail TechCrush before they have even had a chance to get some content out. It’s true! Apparently, Mike Arrington did NOT send out some vitrolic cease and desist letter. It was more like a nice, professional email suggesting that TechCrush might be infringing on a trademark or two, and hey, wouldn’t it be nice if we could just sit down and talk about our options. It looks as though an agreement was happily and amicably reached: mid day, Sept 21: I speak with my lawyer. we discuss asking them to put a disclaimer on the site that they aren’t affiliated with techcrunch. I send an email to Lutz that says “Hey Lutz, Spoke to my lawyer at length today. How about a statement somewhere, preferably in the header area, that simply says you aren’t affiliated with TechCrunch in any way? If that doesn’t work for you, let’s keep talking…and there is no need to stop posting on the site…looking forward to more good content. Mike” […] Deep Jive Interests » TechCrunch Trademark Tiff Ends Amicably; TechCrunch Lawyers Working Furiously To Secure Trademark?, September 22nd, 2006 […] Mr. Arrington also posted recently: mid day, Sept 21: I speak with my lawyer. we discuss asking them to put a disclaimer on the site that they aren’t affiliated with techcrunch. I send an email to Lutz that says “Hey Lutz, Spoke to my lawyer at length today. How about a statement somewhere, preferably in the header area, that simply says you aren’t affiliated with TechCrunch in any way? If that doesn’t work for you, let’s keep talking…and there is no need to stop posting on the site…looking forward to more good content. Mike” […] Mike should lay off TechCrush — and Dead 2.0 » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work, September 22nd, 2006 […] Mike has posted a chronology of events here. Still seems kind of pissed at Stowe Boyd. […] :Ben Metcalfe Blog » Blog Archive » Michael Arrington sets the record straight on TechCrush, September 22nd, 2006 […] Micheal has set the record straight (at least from his perspective) by setting out the string of events that have occurred around this issue. […] [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/comment-page-1/#comment-53393 duncanriley.com » Is Mike Arrington and TechCrunch taking legal action against Techcrush? Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:16:14 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/#comment-53393 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work Says: September 22nd, 2006 at 8:46 pm [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work Says: September 22nd, 2006 at 8:46 pm [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/comment-page-1/#comment-53381 Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:33:33 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/#comment-53381 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging crunchnotes.com Found 1 day ago So it turns out the guy who anonymously writes dead2.0, an occasionally insightful blog, has been identified . He's a VP at a startup that we'd cover at TechCrunch and CrunchGear, and that I lean towards liking. ... Tagged: Mike should lay off TechCrush - and Dead 2.0 mathewingram.com Found 1 day ago There's a nasty mess brewing in the blogosphere, boys and girls -- once again, the dark shadow of lawyers and trademark infringement is passing across our fair land ( Ed: knock it off with the Lord of the Rings vibe already ). ... Permalink Look Out Mama There's a White Boat Comin' Up the River newsome.org Found 1 day ago With a big red beacon, and a flag, and a man on the rail. Last night I wrote in another post that people who think the blogosphere is their road to riches don't want to engage those who raise issues that might make people think the oasis up ahead is a only a mirage. ... Permalink Personal Integrity...hello? jack-of-all-tradez.blogspot.com Found 1 day ago Just reading about the so-called 'outing' of an anonymous blogger known for his personal attacks and cheap shots. I have never read him, but after checking out his blog I realize I likely wouldn't want to anyway - even if I did agree with his views. ... Permalink Untitled scripting.com Found 1 day ago Mike Arrington says he knows who the anonymous blogger, Dead 2.0, is, but he hasn't told the rest of us. It could be a good thing for the tech blogosphere to put a name to this person, might make people think again before taking cheap shots if they might end up being responsible for what they say. ... Permalink Scripting News for 9/21/2006 scripting.wordpress.com Found 1 day ago Posted in Scripting News at 6:25 am by Dave Winer Mike Arrington says he knows who the anonymous blogger, Dead 2.0, is, but he hasn't told the rest of us. It could be a good thing for the tech blogosphere to put a name to this person, might make people think again before taking cheap shots if they could end up being responsible for what they say. ... Permalink Lots of links weblogs.macromedia.com Found 21 hours ago Lots of links: Many things which I found interesting the last few days, variety of subjects, which I can't toss out before updating my Firefox.... ;-) Matt Chotin notes Adobe hiring on Flex/LiveCycle integration. ... Permalink CrunchNotes » Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging blackrimglasses.com Found 1 day ago CrunchNotes » Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging : but the side effects of non-anonymous assholiness are still gold in the blogosphere. Permalink Dead 2.0, and Why It's Dangerous to be Anonymous Online technologyevangelist.com Found 1 day ago "In the blogosphere, anonymity - falsely achieved or not - serves a useful purpose for select parties (bloggers fearing political persecution and parent bloggers protecting their children's identity, come to mind). ... Permalink 匿名部落格攻擊 charlesc.ilovemeow.net Found 17 hours ago Dead 2.0 是一個以 "Anti-hyping Web 2.0″ 為己任的網站，作者是匿名的，某天 被人發現 他的真實身份是某個新創公司的副總，於是 Michael Arrington 拿出來討論對於其公司的影響（ Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging Permalink TechCrush Grounded Before It Gets Chance To Fly? deepjiveinterests.com Found 1 day ago I reported a few days ago about TechCrush ( and has been noticed by a few others ) the outfit started up by a couple German entrepreneurs. Seems like their raison d'etre was to keep an eye on Web2.0 companies profiled by TechCrunch in the days, weeks, months and possibly years afterwards -- possibly providing a more balanced opinion after the hype has had a chance to settle. ... Permalink Does it Matter just.shelleypowers.com Found 1 day ago Does who I am really matter? No. I agree with Don Park , in comments to this post : As for me, I would rather be receiving end of cheapshots than participate in an involuntary outting that could result in loss of job and ruined reputation. ... Permalink [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging crunchnotes.com Found 1 day ago So it turns out the guy who anonymously writes dead2.0, an occasionally insightful blog, has been identified . He’s a VP at a startup that we’d cover at TechCrunch and CrunchGear, and that I lean towards liking. … Tagged: Mike should lay off TechCrush – and Dead 2.0 mathewingram.com Found 1 day ago There’s a nasty mess brewing in the blogosphere, boys and girls — once again, the dark shadow of lawyers and trademark infringement is passing across our fair land ( Ed: knock it off with the Lord of the Rings vibe already ). … Permalink Look Out Mama There’s a White Boat Comin’ Up the River newsome.org Found 1 day ago With a big red beacon, and a flag, and a man on the rail. Last night I wrote in another post that people who think the blogosphere is their road to riches don’t want to engage those who raise issues that might make people think the oasis up ahead is a only a mirage. … Permalink Personal Integrity…hello? jack-of-all-tradez.blogspot.com Found 1 day ago Just reading about the so-called ‘outing’ of an anonymous blogger known for his personal attacks and cheap shots. I have never read him, but after checking out his blog I realize I likely wouldn’t want to anyway – even if I did agree with his views. … Permalink Untitled scripting.com Found 1 day ago Mike Arrington says he knows who the anonymous blogger, Dead 2.0, is, but he hasn’t told the rest of us. It could be a good thing for the tech blogosphere to put a name to this person, might make people think again before taking cheap shots if they might end up being responsible for what they say. … Permalink Scripting News for 9/21/2006 scripting.wordpress.com Found 1 day ago Posted in Scripting News at 6:25 am by Dave Winer Mike Arrington says he knows who the anonymous blogger, Dead 2.0, is, but he hasn’t told the rest of us. It could be a good thing for the tech blogosphere to put a name to this person, might make people think again before taking cheap shots if they could end up being responsible for what they say. … Permalink Lots of links weblogs.macromedia.com Found 21 hours ago Lots of links: Many things which I found interesting the last few days, variety of subjects, which I can’t toss out before updating my Firefox…. ;-) Matt Chotin notes Adobe hiring on Flex/LiveCycle integration. … Permalink CrunchNotes » Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging blackrimglasses.com Found 1 day ago CrunchNotes » Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging : but the side effects of non-anonymous assholiness are still gold in the blogosphere. Permalink Dead 2.0, and Why It’s Dangerous to be Anonymous Online technologyevangelist.com Found 1 day ago “In the blogosphere, anonymity – falsely achieved or not – serves a useful purpose for select parties (bloggers fearing political persecution and parent bloggers protecting their children’s identity, come to mind). … Permalink 匿名部落格攻擊 charlesc.ilovemeow.net Found 17 hours ago Dead 2.0 是一個以 “Anti-hyping Web 2.0″ 為己任的網站，作者是匿名的，某天 被人發現 他的真實身份是某個新創公司的副總，於是 Michael Arrington 拿出來討論對於其公司的影響（ Side Effects of Anonymous Attack Blogging Permalink TechCrush Grounded Before It Gets Chance To Fly? deepjiveinterests.com Found 1 day ago I reported a few days ago about TechCrush ( and has been noticed by a few others ) the outfit started up by a couple German entrepreneurs. Seems like their raison d’etre was to keep an eye on Web2.0 companies profiled by TechCrunch in the days, weeks, months and possibly years afterwards — possibly providing a more balanced opinion after the hype has had a chance to settle. … Permalink Does it Matter just.shelleypowers.com Found 1 day ago Does who I am really matter? No. I agree with Don Park , in comments to this post : As for me, I would rather be receiving end of cheapshots than participate in an involuntary outting that could result in loss of job and ruined reputation. … Permalink [...]

]]> http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/comment-page-1/#comment-53378 Clique Communications: Online Community Marketing through Corporate Weblogs, Podcasts, and Internet Communities » Blog Archive » Is TechCrunch Trademarked Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:16:57 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/21/mike-should-lay-off-techcrush-and-dead-20/#comment-53378 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Mike should lay off TechCrush — and Dead 2.0 » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work Says: September 22nd, 2006 at 11:19 pm [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Mike should lay off TechCrush — and Dead 2.0 » Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work Says: September 22nd, 2006 at 11:19 pm [...]

]]>