<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paying the users &#8212; an ongoing saga</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-98455</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/#comment-98455</guid>
		<description>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped Netscape.com: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped <a href="http://Netscape.com" title="http://Netscape.com" target="_blank">Netscape.com</a>: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-98193</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/#comment-98193</guid>
		<description>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped Netscape.com: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped <a href="http://Netscape.com" title="http://Netscape.com" target="_blank">Netscape.com</a>: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rand($thoughts);</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-49428</link>
		<dc:creator>rand($thoughts);</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/#comment-49428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Capital Equation - Netscape vs. Digg...&lt;/strong&gt;

Iâ€™ve been reading Mathew Ingramâ€™s musings about Netscapeâ€™s decision to pay top â€˜diggersâ€™ for their work (vs. Digg.com, which has stated it is not going to pay top submitters for their work).  Iâ€™ve also just read The Tipping Point.  (yeah, I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Capital Equation - Netscape vs. Digg&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Iâ€™ve been reading Mathew Ingramâ€™s musings about Netscapeâ€™s decision to pay top â€˜diggersâ€™ for their work (vs. <a href="http://Digg.com" title="http://Digg.com" target="_blank">Digg.com</a>, which has stated it is not going to pay top submitters for their work).  Iâ€™ve also just read The Tipping Point.  (yeah, I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paying Diggers - Once More, into the Breach</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-49381</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paying Diggers - Once More, into the Breach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/#comment-49381</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew and I have had a running debate on this of late. His post on the story is here, and I&#8217;ve jumped into the fray with some comments there, too. Mathew notes that &#8220;it&#8217;s not always about dollars&#8221;. I think that&#8217;s true, but I also don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s saying that it is. The issue, it seems to me, is whether it&#8217;s OK to pay top contributors, not whether contributors &#8220;always&#8221; have to be paid. I think the right question is whether paying top contributors to an aggregator like Digg produces an interesting, vibrant community. And as to the question Mathew asks - is contributing &#8220;work&#8221; (I think the right question is whether being a top contributor is work) - I think there&#8217;s a simple answer to it. Would Kevin Rose be a top contributor for free?       Related Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew and I have had a running debate on this of late. His post on the story is here, and I&#8217;ve jumped into the fray with some comments there, too. Mathew notes that &#8220;it&#8217;s not always about dollars&#8221;. I think that&#8217;s true, but I also don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s saying that it is. The issue, it seems to me, is whether it&#8217;s OK to pay top contributors, not whether contributors &#8220;always&#8221; have to be paid. I think the right question is whether paying top contributors to an aggregator like Digg produces an interesting, vibrant community. And as to the question Mathew asks - is contributing &#8220;work&#8221; (I think the right question is whether being a top contributor is work) - I think there&#8217;s a simple answer to it. Would Kevin Rose be a top contributor for free?       Related Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is submitting things to Digg &#8220;work&#8221;? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/comment-page-1/#comment-49137</link>
		<dc:creator>Is submitting things to Digg &#8220;work&#8221;? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/11/paying-the-users-an-ongoing-saga/#comment-49137</guid>
		<description>[...] Paying the users -- an ongoing saga [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paying the users &#8212; an ongoing saga [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
