<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Wired&#8217;s wiki won&#8217;t work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired Wiki, Numbskulls and Collaboration in Business&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-336842</link>
		<dc:creator>Wired Wiki, Numbskulls and Collaboration in Business&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/#comment-336842</guid>
		<description>[...] other words, it&#8217;s more an encyclopedia entry than an article, concludes Mathew Ingram: is has a lot of information (perhaps too much), but it lacks personality. Ironically, other than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other words, it&#8217;s more an encyclopedia entry than an article, concludes Mathew Ingram: is has a lot of information (perhaps too much), but it lacks personality. Ironically, other than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transnets, des gadgets aux rÃ©seaux: Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-65046</link>
		<dc:creator>Transnets, des gadgets aux rÃ©seaux: Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/#comment-65046</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] A quelques jours de la fin de l&#039;expÃ©rience Wired les sceptiques (comme celui-ci) peuvent toujours lever les bras au ciel en disant que le travail collectif est incapable de produire du contenu vraiment bien fait. Ã‡a n&#039;est pas encore certain (il faut attendre le 7) mais c&#039;est possible. Mais rien n&#039;interdit Ã  Ryan et/ou aux Ã©diteurs de Wired de reprendre le texte de base ainsi enrichi et, tout simplement d&#039;en amÃ©liorer la forme. Cela constituerait une solution mixte et peut-Ãªtre un nouveau modÃ¨le de collaborationâ€¦ Ã  condition que la contribution de tous soit reconnue et que le rÃ©sultat soit publiÃ© sous la forme Creative Commons. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] A quelques jours de la fin de l&#8217;expÃ©rience Wired les sceptiques (comme celui-ci) peuvent toujours lever les bras au ciel en disant que le travail collectif est incapable de produire du contenu vraiment bien fait. Ã‡a n&#8217;est pas encore certain (il faut attendre le 7) mais c&#8217;est possible. Mais rien n&#8217;interdit Ã  Ryan et/ou aux Ã©diteurs de Wired de reprendre le texte de base ainsi enrichi et, tout simplement d&#8217;en amÃ©liorer la forme. Cela constituerait une solution mixte et peut-Ãªtre un nouveau modÃ¨le de collaborationâ€¦ Ã  condition que la contribution de tous soit reconnue et que le rÃ©sultat soit publiÃ© sous la forme Creative Commons. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wired wiki a qualified success &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-46037</link>
		<dc:creator>Wired wiki a qualified success &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/#comment-46037</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Wired&#039;s wiki won&#039;t work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Wired&#8217;s wiki won&#8217;t work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-45968</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/#comment-45968</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wired Wiki, Numbskulls and Collaboration in Business...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Wired Wiki experiment is over - the collective result of 25 ad-hoc &quot;editors&quot; is now published&#160;on Wired News: Veni, Vidi, Wiki Was the experiment a success?&#160; I think the process itself was,&#160; but not necessarily the end result. After...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wired Wiki, Numbskulls and Collaboration in Business&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Wired Wiki experiment is over &#8211; the collective result of 25 ad-hoc &#8220;editors&#8221; is now published&nbsp;on Wired News: Veni, Vidi, Wiki Was the experiment a success?&nbsp; I think the process itself was,&nbsp; but not necessarily the end result. After&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PressThink: Exploding By-Lines: Update on NewAssignment.Net</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-45923</link>
		<dc:creator>PressThink: Exploding By-Lines: Update on NewAssignment.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/09/02/why-wireds-wiki-wont-work/#comment-45923</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Wired News asks readers to help edit an article: Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to do the job of a Wired News editor and whip it into shape. Don&#8217;t change the quotes, but feel free to reorganize it, make cuts, smooth the prose or add links &#8212; whatever it takes to make it a lively, engaging news piece.Mathew Ingram says it won&#8217;t work. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Wired News asks readers to help edit an article: Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to do the job of a Wired News editor and whip it into shape. Don&#8217;t change the quotes, but feel free to reorganize it, make cuts, smooth the prose or add links &#8212; whatever it takes to make it a lively, engaging news piece.Mathew Ingram says it won&#8217;t work. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

