<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is YouTube worth $2-billion now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow - Grouper Sells for $65 million</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-41095</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow - Grouper Sells for $65 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-41095</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Is YouTube worth $2-billion now? &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Is YouTube worth $2-billion now? &raquo; Mathew Ingram: <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work" title="http://mathewingram.com/work" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work</a> [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-40027</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-40027</guid>
		<description>1.  Let's see, unclear adsense revenue as their is no provision for liability for possible stolen content.
2.  Worth calculated by a multiple of eyeballs.

Conclusion: where have we seen this type of business model?  Oh yeah, I forgot the long tail really does make it different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Let&#8217;s see, unclear adsense revenue as their is no provision for liability for possible stolen content.<br />
2.  Worth calculated by a multiple of eyeballs.</p>
<p>Conclusion: where have we seen this type of business model?  Oh yeah, I forgot the long tail really does make it different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39301</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39301</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Sean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Sean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39296</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39296</guid>
		<description>You don't need the windows client to use Grouper, although it does give you a lot more features, like private sharing among groups.  You can watch video on the site, upload video through the website, and if you have a webcam you can post video directly to the site.  Plus they give you options for downloading videos to your iPod.  It's way better than Youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need the windows client to use Grouper, although it does give you a lot more features, like private sharing among groups.  You can watch video on the site, upload video through the website, and if you have a webcam you can post video directly to the site.  Plus they give you options for downloading videos to your iPod.  It&#8217;s way better than Youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techmeme</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39856</link>
		<dc:creator>Techmeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/23/is-youtube-worth-2-billion-now/#comment-39856</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Sony pays $65 million for P2P video site GrouperMathew Ingram / mathewingram.com/work:   Is YouTube worth $2-billion now?&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Sony pays $65 million for P2P video site GrouperMathew Ingram / <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work:" title="http://mathewingram.com/work:" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work:</a>   Is YouTube worth $2-billion now?<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
