<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is YouTube good for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brittany</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-346376</link>
		<dc:creator>brittany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 06:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/#comment-346376</guid>
		<description>nice blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;check out my webpage &lt;a href=&quot;http://brittanycam.webs.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://brittanycam.webs.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice blog.</p>
<p>check out my webpage <a href="http://brittanycam.webs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://brittanycam.webs.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-45290</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/#comment-45290</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Jeff.  Do you have any evidence for your belief it&#039;s a hoax, other than the stuff that Virginia Heffernan has written about on her NYT blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Jeff.  Do you have any evidence for your belief it&#8217;s a hoax, other than the stuff that Virginia Heffernan has written about on her NYT blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-45263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/#comment-45263</guid>
		<description>Lonelygirl15 IS a b-list celebrity.  She&#039;s not exactly who she makes herself out to be.  She&#039;s in fact a hoax.  Well, it&#039;s not a fact, YET.  But there is a method to her madness and an explanation behind her millions of views and subscribers.  

This may be just a conspiracy theory though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lonelygirl15 IS a b-list celebrity.  She&#8217;s not exactly who she makes herself out to be.  She&#8217;s in fact a hoax.  Well, it&#8217;s not a fact, YET.  But there is a method to her madness and an explanation behind her millions of views and subscribers.  </p>
<p>This may be just a conspiracy theory though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-38272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/#comment-38272</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Andrew -- glad to help with the de-closetization  :-)  As for the monetizing thing, that&#039;s an interesting question.  Brookers got a deal with a TV development company (no numbers though), and the Mentos guys got some cash to come up with new uses for the candy other than dunking in Diet Coke -- could someone offer Bree some dosh to fight with Daniel for pay? And would that ruin the appeal? I wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Andrew &#8212; glad to help with the de-closetization  :-)  As for the monetizing thing, that&#8217;s an interesting question.  Brookers got a deal with a TV development company (no numbers though), and the Mentos guys got some cash to come up with new uses for the candy other than dunking in Diet Coke &#8212; could someone offer Bree some dosh to fight with Daniel for pay? And would that ruin the appeal? I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/comment-page-1/#comment-38271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/20/what-is-youtube-good-for/#comment-38271</guid>
		<description>I thought I was alone, I too am captivated by the &quot;Bree and Daniel Show&quot;...   feels good to be out of the closet..  

I have been pondering monetization of Youtube, not the site itself, but how does someone like Bree, monetize her exposure.   There are many B list celebrities in Hollywood that would kill for the exposure she gets..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was alone, I too am captivated by the &#8220;Bree and Daniel Show&#8221;&#8230;   feels good to be out of the closet..  </p>
<p>I have been pondering monetization of Youtube, not the site itself, but how does someone like Bree, monetize her exposure.   There are many B list celebrities in Hollywood that would kill for the exposure she gets..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

