<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg for free vs. Digg for dough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legalizing The Underground Digg Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/comment-page-1/#comment-98190</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalizing The Underground Digg Economy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/#comment-98190</guid>
		<description>[...] The point here is not to out the Diggers or the sites they are working for, so I have left out the name of the person emailing me, his position, and the company he works for. While I personally don&#8217;t condone getting paid by content producers to contribute content to socially driven sites, it is understandable why people do and here is my attempt to understand why monetarily motivating the &#8217;social&#8217; aspect of social media gets a bad rep., and how to rectify the problem without compromising the sites&#8217; integrity and quality. I remember Kevin Rose saying that he wants Digg to be a â€œtrue, free, democratic social platform devoid of monetary motivations,â€ and that &#8220;When something makes it to the front page, the only motivation should be that the story was interesting to somebody, not that they were paid to do it.&#8221; I completely disagree with people who think it is a bad idea to monetarily motivate social bookmarkers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The point here is not to out the Diggers or the sites they are working for, so I have left out the name of the person emailing me, his position, and the company he works for. While I personally don&#8217;t condone getting paid by content producers to contribute content to socially driven sites, it is understandable why people do and here is my attempt to understand why monetarily motivating the &#8217;social&#8217; aspect of social media gets a bad rep., and how to rectify the problem without compromising the sites&#8217; integrity and quality. I remember Kevin Rose saying that he wants Digg to be a â€œtrue, free, democratic social platform devoid of monetary motivations,â€ and that &#8220;When something makes it to the front page, the only motivation should be that the story was interesting to somebody, not that they were paid to do it.&#8221; I completely disagree with people who think it is a bad idea to monetarily motivate social bookmarkers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/comment-page-1/#comment-97950</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/#comment-97950</guid>
		<description>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped Netscape.com: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped <a href="http://Netscape.com" title="http://Netscape.com" target="_blank">Netscape.com</a>: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/comment-page-1/#comment-97948</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 04:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/#comment-97948</guid>
		<description>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped Netscape.com: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If nothing else, Jason Calacanis did one thing while he was running the revamped <a href="http://Netscape.com" title="http://Netscape.com" target="_blank">Netscape.com</a>: By hiring away some of the top users at Digg, he ignited a debate about whether to compensate the top submitters to a &#8220;social media&#8221; site. Digg co-founder Kevin Rose said that he would never pay top Diggers because it would ruin the open and social nature of the site, and I tend to agree with him (I wrote about it here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paying the users &#8212; an ongoing saga &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/comment-page-1/#comment-49080</link>
		<dc:creator>Paying the users &#8212; an ongoing saga &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/#comment-49080</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll leave questions of spin to the spin-meister. I&#8217;m not convinced that the issue of paying submitters for their work is quite settled yet. As I wrote when Jason jumped up to confront Yochai Benkler about his theories on social networks, I think there are a lot of questions yet unanswered (Marshall Kirkpatrick has a nice overview of the issues at TechCrunch). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll leave questions of spin to the spin-meister. I&#8217;m not convinced that the issue of paying submitters for their work is quite settled yet. As I wrote when Jason jumped up to confront Yochai Benkler about his theories on social networks, I think there are a lot of questions yet unanswered (Marshall Kirkpatrick has a nice overview of the issues at TechCrunch). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lina Papasotiriou</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/comment-page-1/#comment-31560</link>
		<dc:creator>Lina Papasotiriou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/06/digg-for-free-vs-digg-for-dough/#comment-31560</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathew,
 
I do not think there is anything wrong with people getting paid for their work. I think good work should be recognized and one way to earn such recognition is monetary. Nothing wrong with doing what you love and getting paid for it. 
 
Lina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathew,</p>
<p>I do not think there is anything wrong with people getting paid for their work. I think good work should be recognized and one way to earn such recognition is monetary. Nothing wrong with doing what you love and getting paid for it. </p>
<p>Lina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
