<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $60-million &#8212; can you Digg that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tsiolis</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/comment-page-1/#comment-29706</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tsiolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/#comment-29706</guid>
		<description>If the BW article can accomplish anything, I hope it can open discussion as to how web companies are valued once and for all.  Personally,  I don&#039;t think being a web company changes the fact that revenues and profits still come before eyeballs/page views, etc.

I like using Digg and will be launching a similar site for the small-cap industry in September - but I believe we can all agree on the fact that it isn&#039;t worth anywhere near $200M if it can&#039;t turn a profit, nor present a viable plan for doing so in the near future.

If not $200M, then what is the number?  Would love to see discussion on how we get to a more realistic number for Digg and all web properties.  It would provide a basis for better discussions in the future.

Best,
George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the BW article can accomplish anything, I hope it can open discussion as to how web companies are valued once and for all.  Personally,  I don&#8217;t think being a web company changes the fact that revenues and profits still come before eyeballs/page views, etc.</p>
<p>I like using Digg and will be launching a similar site for the small-cap industry in September &#8211; but I believe we can all agree on the fact that it isn&#8217;t worth anywhere near $200M if it can&#8217;t turn a profit, nor present a viable plan for doing so in the near future.</p>
<p>If not $200M, then what is the number?  Would love to see discussion on how we get to a more realistic number for Digg and all web properties.  It would provide a basis for better discussions in the future.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/comment-page-1/#comment-29478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/#comment-29478</guid>
		<description>That was a pretty good one alright, George.  You must have read as many of those e-mail stock pitches as I have  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a pretty good one alright, George.  You must have read as many of those e-mail stock pitches as I have  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tsiolis</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/comment-page-1/#comment-29428</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tsiolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/04/60-million-can-you-digg-that/#comment-29428</guid>
		<description>Mat, have a look at my post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2006/08/04/you_cant_spend.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kedrosky&lt;/a&gt; that Jason replied to as &quot;priceless&quot;


Best,
George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mat, have a look at my post on <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2006/08/04/you_cant_spend.html" rel="nofollow">Kedrosky</a> that Jason replied to as &#8220;priceless&#8221;</p>
<p>Best,<br />
George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

