<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A breath of fresh air from Nick Denton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawker&#8217;s Restructuring, Old New Media, and Bubble 2.0 &#187; Publishing 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/comment-page-1/#comment-204517</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawker&#8217;s Restructuring, Old New Media, and Bubble 2.0 &#187; Publishing 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-204517</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Mathew Ingram makes a similar observation:   In many ways, DentonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Gawker.com stable Ã¢â‚¬â€ much like Jason CalacanisÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s very similar Weblogs Inc., now owned by AOL Ã¢â‚¬â€ are more like traditional magazines than they are like blogs. They have short items posted regularly, just like blogs, and they often have personality and a point of view just like blogs, but many of them donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t accept comments (Valleywag makes you apply to be a member who can comment) and donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t really have a sense of community about them. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Mathew Ingram makes a similar observation:   In many ways, DentonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s <a href="http://Gawker.com" title="http://Gawker.com" target="_blank">Gawker.com</a> stable Ã¢â‚¬â€ much like Jason CalacanisÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s very similar Weblogs Inc., now owned by AOL Ã¢â‚¬â€ are more like traditional magazines than they are like blogs. They have short items posted regularly, just like blogs, and they often have personality and a point of view just like blogs, but many of them donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t accept comments (Valleywag makes you apply to be a member who can comment) and donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t really have a sense of community about them. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harry, Harry, quite contrary</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/comment-page-1/#comment-19655</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harry, Harry, quite contrary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-19655</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] A breath of fresh air from Nick Denton &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work Says:  July 3rd, 2006 at 10:03 am [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] A breath of fresh air from Nick Denton &raquo; Mathew Ingram: <a href="http://mathewingram.com/work" title="http://mathewingram.com/work" target="_blank">mathewingram.com/work</a> Says:  July 3rd, 2006 at 10:03 am [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing 2.0 &#187; Gawker&#8217;s Restructuring, Old New Media, and Bubble 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/comment-page-1/#comment-19060</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing 2.0 &#187; Gawker&#8217;s Restructuring, Old New Media, and Bubble 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-19060</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram makes a similar observation:   In many ways, Dentonâ€™s Gawker.com stable â€” much like Jason Calacanisâ€™s very similar Weblogs Inc., now owned by AOL â€” are more like traditional magazines than they are like blogs. They have short items posted regularly, just like blogs, and they often have personality and a point of view just like blogs, but many of them donâ€™t accept comments (Valleywag makes you apply to be a member who can comment) and donâ€™t really have a sense of community about them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram makes a similar observation:   In many ways, Dentonâ€™s <a href="http://Gawker.com" title="http://Gawker.com" target="_blank">Gawker.com</a> stable â€” much like Jason Calacanisâ€™s very similar Weblogs Inc., now owned by AOL â€” are more like traditional magazines than they are like blogs. They have short items posted regularly, just like blogs, and they often have personality and a point of view just like blogs, but many of them donâ€™t accept comments (Valleywag makes you apply to be a member who can comment) and donâ€™t really have a sense of community about them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/comment-page-1/#comment-19057</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-19057</guid>
		<description>denton&#039;s pragmatic approach is certainly different from the recent moves made by om malik and paidcontent. that said, it&#039;s probably easier to make tough decisions when you already have a strong foundation to build upon. what&#039;s also interesting is clearly denton doesn&#039;t need the money so maybe gawker is part-business empire, part-experiment, part ego-vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>denton&#8217;s pragmatic approach is certainly different from the recent moves made by om malik and paidcontent. that said, it&#8217;s probably easier to make tough decisions when you already have a strong foundation to build upon. what&#8217;s also interesting is clearly denton doesn&#8217;t need the money so maybe gawker is part-business empire, part-experiment, part ego-vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigbellamy.net</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/comment-page-1/#comment-19190</link>
		<dc:creator>craigbellamy.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/07/03/a-breath-of-fresh-air-from-nick-denton/#comment-19190</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; [IMG RSS] technorati tag=web2.0  Keep me peepinâ€™Social Software Gives You: Spam, Porn and more!Web2.0â€ç†å¿µ (zt)5 Ways To Start A Blog ConversationA breath of fresh air from Nick Denton&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> [IMG RSS] technorati tag=web2.0  Keep me peepinâ€™Social Software Gives You: Spam, Porn and more!Web2.0â€ç†å¿µ (zt)5 Ways To Start A Blog ConversationA breath of fresh air from Nick Denton<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

