<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should newspapers have a pay wall?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-13156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-13156</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-13155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-13155</guid>
		<description>You make some interesting points Mathew. Definitely food for thought as I work through similar problems for a rival publication. My thoughts on the matter are mixed. I agree that papers like the times, WSJ and the other big 10-15 could charge for their most sought-after content but look at what Forbes.com did (as I learned at Mesh). When Forbes pulled down the wall, traffic skyrocketed giving it more advertising opportunities and room to jack up rates. After all, news sites are in the eyeballs biz, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some interesting points Mathew. Definitely food for thought as I work through similar problems for a rival publication. My thoughts on the matter are mixed. I agree that papers like the times, WSJ and the other big 10-15 could charge for their most sought-after content but look at what <a href="http://Forbes.com" title="http://Forbes.com" target="_blank">Forbes.com</a> did (as I learned at Mesh). When Forbes pulled down the wall, traffic skyrocketed giving it more advertising opportunities and room to jack up rates. After all, news sites are in the eyeballs biz, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-19857</link>
		<dc:creator>Online marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/08/should-newspapers-have-a-pay-wall/#comment-19857</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Original post:Should newspapers have a pay wall? by at Google Blog Search: make money&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->  Original post:Should newspapers have a pay wall? by at Google Blog Search: make money<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
