<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Items that might become posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-11806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/#comment-11806</guid>
		<description>I agree, Anne -- &quot;participatory journalism&quot; has a kind of clinical, laboratory-type feel to it, while &quot;citizen media&quot; sounds like something Chairman Mao might have come up with.  Just for fun sometimes, I greet my co-workers at the Globe and Mail with a hearty cheer: &quot;Greetings, Citizen Journalist!&quot; 

I guess the inability to come up with a satisfactory term for it says volumes about how much we are still struggling with what it is and what it means.

Thanks for the comment.

Mathew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Anne &#8212; &#8220;participatory journalism&#8221; has a kind of clinical, laboratory-type feel to it, while &#8220;citizen media&#8221; sounds like something Chairman Mao might have come up with.  Just for fun sometimes, I greet my co-workers at the Globe and Mail with a hearty cheer: &#8220;Greetings, Citizen Journalist!&#8221; </p>
<p>I guess the inability to come up with a satisfactory term for it says volumes about how much we are still struggling with what it is and what it means.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Mathew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-11798</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/06/02/items-that-might-become-posts/#comment-11798</guid>
		<description>Great set of links here. Thanks. 

I prefer &quot;participatory media&quot; to &quot;citizen journalism&quot; too. Calling bloggers journalists sets them up for the kind of critique Tim O&#039;Reilly launched last week; e.g., why didn&#039;t the bloggers who commented on the service mark issue do the same fact checking the NY Times did? Um, because we&#039;re not journalists for the most part and we don&#039;t own our own fact checking departments. 

But &quot;participatory media&quot; doesn&#039;t quite capture it for me either. That makes it sound like  some sort of interactive TV show where the audience merely gets to choose what ending is shown. I&#039;m going to think on it some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great set of links here. Thanks. </p>
<p>I prefer &#8220;participatory media&#8221; to &#8220;citizen journalism&#8221; too. Calling bloggers journalists sets them up for the kind of critique Tim O&#8217;Reilly launched last week; e.g., why didn&#8217;t the bloggers who commented on the service mark issue do the same fact checking the NY Times did? Um, because we&#8217;re not journalists for the most part and we don&#8217;t own our own fact checking departments. </p>
<p>But &#8220;participatory media&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite capture it for me either. That makes it sound like  some sort of interactive TV show where the audience merely gets to choose what ending is shown. I&#8217;m going to think on it some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

