<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court says that bloggers are journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shoemoney</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-11363</link>
		<dc:creator>shoemoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=328#comment-11363</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;shoemoney&lt;/strong&gt;

nice shoemoney site at shoemoney http://www.imyourhuckleberry.info/ 47</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>shoemoney</strong></p>
<p>nice shoemoney site at shoemoney <a href="http://www.imyourhuckleberry.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imyourhuckleberry.info/</a> 47</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool site</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>cool site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=328#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cool site&lt;/strong&gt;

check this out: http://www.aspectinformation.info/ 50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cool site</strong></p>
<p>check this out: <a href="http://www.aspectinformation.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aspectinformation.info/</a> 50</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deal architect</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-19421</link>
		<dc:creator>deal architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=328#comment-19421</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;you bust chops with in the virtual world. I, for one, would like to hear what political bloggers do for day jobs. An aside about Vegas - with a thousand plus blogs looking for fodder, what is the probability what happens there will stay there? -)  b)Mathew Ingram analyzes the court decision that bloggers have same First Amendment protections as journalists. I know some journalists think we are aliens, and most bloggers think they are practitioners not journalists, but the case shows the growing influence of&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->you bust chops with in the virtual world. I, for one, would like to hear what political bloggers do for day jobs. An aside about Vegas &#8211; with a thousand plus blogs looking for fodder, what is the probability what happens there will stay there? -)  b)Mathew Ingram analyzes the court decision that bloggers have same First Amendment protections as journalists. I know some journalists think we are aliens, and most bloggers think they are practitioners not journalists, but the case shows the growing influence of<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 on ebizQ - ebizQ</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-19422</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 on ebizQ - ebizQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=328#comment-19422</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Court says that bloggers are journalists&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Court says that bloggers are journalists<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/27/court-says-that-bloggers-are-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-19423</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=328#comment-19423</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;legion - of U.S. constitutional law generally, or of First Amendment law in particular, but the news of the U.S. Supreme Courtâ€™s decision depriving certain whistleblowers of that amendmentâ€™s protection caught my eye, coming as it did so soon aftera California state appeals court ruled that a blogger was entitled to protection under that stateâ€™s reporter shield law.  The Supremes appear to have decided that speech pursuant to work duties is not protected speech, while speech as a citizen is. The&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->legion &#8211; of U.S. constitutional law generally, or of First Amendment law in particular, but the news of the U.S. Supreme Courtâ€™s decision depriving certain whistleblowers of that amendmentâ€™s protection caught my eye, coming as it did so soon aftera California state appeals court ruled that a blogger was entitled to protection under that stateâ€™s reporter shield law.  The Supremes appear to have decided that speech pursuant to work duties is not protected speech, while speech as a citizen is. The<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

