Comments on: This is taking the FOO thing too far http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:59:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Chrono Tron >> World Wide Weblog http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-31357 Chrono Tron >> World Wide Weblog Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:24:21 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/#comment-31357 <strong>Bullism of the year: Web 2.0 trademarked?...</strong> Web 2.0 is the buzzword of this decade. Infact, after the dot com bust, many claim that web 2.0 was the main factor for the web’s re-unity and it’s phenomenal growth. I’ve blogged about what exactly is web 2.0 before. We all know that... Bullism of the year: Web 2.0 trademarked?…

Web 2.0 is the buzzword of this decade. Infact, after the dot com bust, many claim that web 2.0 was the main factor for the web’s re-unity and it’s phenomenal growth. I’ve blogged about what exactly is web 2.0 before. We all know that…

]]> By: Mathew Ingram http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-9537 Mathew Ingram Fri, 26 May 2006 17:08:26 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/#comment-9537 I agree, Dennis. And Chris, I think that's a terrific idea -- I hope Tim decides to do something like that. He seems like a standup guy, so let's keep our fingers crossed. Mathew I agree, Dennis. And Chris, I think that’s a terrific idea — I hope Tim decides to do something like that. He seems like a standup guy, so let’s keep our fingers crossed.

Mathew

]]> By: Chris Messina http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-9530 Chris Messina Fri, 26 May 2006 16:10:38 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/#comment-9530 Hmm. Maybe Web 2.0 should be treated as a <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/14/the-case-for-community-marks/" rel="nofollow">Community Mark</a>. Hmm. Maybe Web 2.0 should be treated as a Community Mark.

]]> By: Dennis Howlett http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-9524 Dennis Howlett Fri, 26 May 2006 15:23:51 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/#comment-9524 This debacle illustrates everything the non-US world hates about America. And in so doing, Ms Wenge (who surely must qualify for opt ranking on Wankr.com) has reinforced the cynics who would say the 'open' nature of current social computing is nothing other than a marketing sham. This debacle illustrates everything the non-US world hates about America. And in so doing, Ms Wenge (who surely must qualify for opt ranking on Wankr.com) has reinforced the cynics who would say the ‘open’ nature of current social computing is nothing other than a marketing sham.

]]> By: Mark Evans http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-9512 Mark Evans Fri, 26 May 2006 14:39:04 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/25/this-is-taking-the-foo-thing-too-far/#comment-9512 mathew, maybe o'reillly got advice about whether or not to patent web 2.0 from the same people who thought the vonage IPO was a good investment...:) bad move, tim, bad move. mathew,
maybe o’reillly got advice about whether or not to patent web 2.0 from the same people who thought the vonage IPO was a good investment…:) bad move, tim, bad move.

]]>