<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype lands a blow in VoIP battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TecHKnow</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-6917</link>
		<dc:creator>TecHKnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 13:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/#comment-6917</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Its 1996 all over again&lt;/strong&gt;

By Darren LerouxEarlier this week my self and a number of colleagues, (Ian Barr, Brendan Hodgson, Lisa...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Its 1996 all over again</strong></p>
<p>By Darren LerouxEarlier this week my self and a number of colleagues, (Ian Barr, Brendan Hodgson, Lisa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Main Page -- A View from the Isle</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-19416</link>
		<dc:creator>Main Page -- A View from the Isle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/18/skype-lands-a-blow-in-voip-battle/#comment-19416</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;mention the cable companies, all of whom have very deep pockets. Call this the first punch in what could be a long slugfest over the VoIP market. The good part for consumers, of course, is that it means using the telephone continues to get cheaper.â€”Mathew Ingram   Saving grace?Â  Vonage is easy and lets people use something they (pretty much ... though sometimes I wonder) know how to useâ€”a standard phone.Â  The question will be if the CableCos figure out a little clever collaboration to sink Vonage, then&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->mention the cable companies, all of whom have very deep pockets. Call this the first punch in what could be a long slugfest over the VoIP market. The good part for consumers, of course, is that it means using the telephone continues to get cheaper.â€”Mathew Ingram   Saving grace?Â  Vonage is easy and lets people use something they (pretty much &#8230; though sometimes I wonder) know how to useâ€”a standard phone.Â  The question will be if the CableCos figure out a little clever collaboration to sink Vonage, then<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
