<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s new toy for math geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/11/googles-new-toy-for-math-geeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/11/googles-new-toy-for-math-geeks/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Main Page -- A View from the Isle</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/11/googles-new-toy-for-math-geeks/comment-page-1/#comment-19414</link>
		<dc:creator>Main Page -- A View from the Isle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/11/googles-new-toy-for-math-geeks/#comment-19414</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;start a Web 2.0 company is low (financed by credit cards), you need real money to hire and retain real people and talent.  How many of the things that are out there aren&#039;t products, but really features.Â  Google seems to be particularly guilty of this (Google Co-op for wrangling Web 2.0 chickens).  [IMG ]Death of the IPO ... the big &quot;exits&quot; ... acquisitions ... since IPOs aren&#039;t viable, I gather, that people are looking towards the buyout for the big cash.  Is the reliance on AdSense a bad thing?Â  Paul thinks so, like putting all your eggs in&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->start a Web 2.0 company is low (financed by credit cards), you need real money to hire and retain real people and talent.  How many of the things that are out there aren&#8217;t products, but really features.Â  Google seems to be particularly guilty of this (Google Co-op for wrangling Web 2.0 chickens).  [IMG ]Death of the IPO &#8230; the big &#8220;exits&#8221; &#8230; acquisitions &#8230; since IPOs aren&#8217;t viable, I gather, that people are looking towards the buyout for the big cash.  Is the reliance on AdSense a bad thing?Â  Paul thinks so, like putting all your eggs in<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

