<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you apply wikis to democracy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-330218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-330218</guid>
		<description>The reason Wikipedia is so successful is because its articles are descriptive. While there can be disagreement over some particulars, generally it is pretty easy to achieve consensus on a descriptive article.

Politics and governance are pro-active, not descriptive, so the wiki model is much more difficult to implement.

However, it appears that there is now a new approach addresses this downfall of a completely open government. The main thing they add is to provide for a very sophisticated scoring mechanism, whereby users can be ranked by other users. Basically, the more that people respect you, the more say you have in governance. It's a little more complicated than that, but that's the idea.

Have a look at the project:
http://www.metagovernment.org

It is just starting up, and they haven't even developed the scoring system, but they do now have a roadmap for how they intend to proceed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Wikipedia is so successful is because its articles are descriptive. While there can be disagreement over some particulars, generally it is pretty easy to achieve consensus on a descriptive article.</p>
<p>Politics and governance are pro-active, not descriptive, so the wiki model is much more difficult to implement.</p>
<p>However, it appears that there is now a new approach addresses this downfall of a completely open government. The main thing they add is to provide for a very sophisticated scoring mechanism, whereby users can be ranked by other users. Basically, the more that people respect you, the more say you have in governance. It&#8217;s a little more complicated than that, but that&#8217;s the idea.</p>
<p>Have a look at the project:<br />
<a href="http://www.metagovernment.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.metagovernment.org</a></p>
<p>It is just starting up, and they haven&#8217;t even developed the scoring system, but they do now have a roadmap for how they intend to proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3871</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3871</guid>
		<description>Fair enough -- although I'd like to think I put a little more thought into my average post than it takes to say (or type) "Bah, humbug" three times in a row.  You may disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough &#8212; although I&#8217;d like to think I put a little more thought into my average post than it takes to say (or type) &#8220;Bah, humbug&#8221; three times in a row.  You may disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3846</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 22:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3846</guid>
		<description>Well, not to be rude, but how often do you have the same type of content in the post (more or less)? [i.e. Web2.0/blogs/wikis ...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not to be rude, but how often do you have the same type of content in the post (more or less)? [i.e. Web2.0/blogs/wikis ...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3737</guid>
		<description>Thanks, for the comment Rod.  And I think you are right -- that's obviously one of the big threats to that kind of model.

And Seth, thanks for your comment too -- although you seem to have the same type of comment (more or less) regardless of the content of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, for the comment Rod.  And I think you are right &#8212; that&#8217;s obviously one of the big threats to that kind of model.</p>
<p>And Seth, thanks for your comment too &#8212; although you seem to have the same type of comment (more or less) regardless of the content of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3716</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/05/07/can-you-apply-wikis-to-democracy/#comment-3716</guid>
		<description>Problem: The most vocal/participatory members of society don't always/usually represent the mainstream. Its not the numbskulls that will take over, but anyone with a specific policy agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem: The most vocal/participatory members of society don&#8217;t always/usually represent the mainstream. Its not the numbskulls that will take over, but anyone with a specific policy agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
