<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jimmy Wales defends Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Carr, the king of all trolls &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-9240</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Carr, the king of all trolls &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 01:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-9240</guid>
		<description>[...] with del.icio.us &#160; &#124; &#160; Email this entry  &#160; &#124; &#160; TrackBack URI &#160; &#124; &#160; Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with <a href="http://del.icio.us" title="http://del.icio.us" target="_blank">del.icio.us</a> &nbsp; | &nbsp; Email this entry  &nbsp; | &nbsp; TrackBack URI &nbsp; | &nbsp; Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; |&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>[...] Jimmy Wales defends Wikipedia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jimmy Wales defends Wikipedia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean's World</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cox back in the saddle&lt;/strong&gt;

After a couple of under-the-weather months during the bad weather months, Bob Cox of The National Debate and the Media Bloggers Associat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cox back in the saddle</strong></p>
<p>After a couple of under-the-weather months during the bad weather months, Bob Cox of The National Debate and the Media Bloggers Associat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olbermann Watch - reality-based news for the belligerently uninformed</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-19408</link>
		<dc:creator>Olbermann Watch - reality-based news for the belligerently uninformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-19408</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;entry. Some of these editors have openly sought to use that page to market their own fan sites and forums. Not surprisingly, the Keith Olbermann entry is massively non-NPOV.  UPDATE:  Mathew Ingram, technology writer with The Globe and Mail in Toronto,weighs in  J.D. Lasica has been converted.  "If journalism suffers from an institutional malaise, it's because we have too few journalists like Olbermann who are willing to speak truth to power."&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->entry. Some of these editors have openly sought to use that page to market their own fan sites and forums. Not surprisingly, the Keith Olbermann entry is massively non-NPOV.  UPDATE:  Mathew Ingram, technology writer with The Globe and Mail in Toronto,weighs in  J.D. Lasica has been converted.  &#8220;If journalism suffers from an institutional malaise, it&#8217;s because we have too few journalists like Olbermann who are willing to speak truth to power.&#8221;<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The National Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-19409</link>
		<dc:creator>The National Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/22/jimmy-wales-defends-wikipedia/#comment-19409</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;at left) and Wikipedia founder Wales (pictured above) to find out what the project’s effervescent leader thought about political bias and how Wikipedia deals with it.  UPDATE:  Mathew Ingram, technology writer with The Globe and Mail in Toronto,weighs in  J.D. Lasica has been converted.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->at left) and Wikipedia founder Wales (pictured above) to find out what the project’s effervescent leader thought about political bias and how Wikipedia deals with it.  UPDATE:  Mathew Ingram, technology writer with The Globe and Mail in Toronto,weighs in  J.D. Lasica has been converted.<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
