<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bayosphere becomes part of Backfence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; A back fence around a ghost town</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-164000</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; A back fence around a ghost town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-164000</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A back fence around a ghost town &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-163998</link>
		<dc:creator>A back fence around a ghost town &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-163998</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine.net</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Collective Wisdom on the Backfence-Bayosphere Acquisition&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s been a lot of interesting press today about the acquisition of Bayosphere by Backfence. (Disclosure note: Omidyar Network is a co-investor in both firms, and I serve on the board of Backfence.) It&#039;s been amazing to watch the landscape</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collective Wisdom on the Backfence-Bayosphere Acquisition</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of interesting press today about the acquisition of Bayosphere by Backfence. (Disclosure note: Omidyar Network is a co-investor in both firms, and I serve on the board of Backfence.) It&#8217;s been amazing to watch the landscape</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Richard.  I will edit the post to reflect that.

Mathew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Richard.  I will edit the post to reflect that.</p>
<p>Mathew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Mitch Kapor is not the inventor of Lotus Notes.  He was the CEO of Lotus and he made the agreement that resulted in Lotus funding Ray Ozzie&#039;s company Iris Associates, which developed Notes.  It was a team effort, but if anyone gets the credit as inventor, it&#039;s Ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch Kapor is not the inventor of Lotus Notes.  He was the CEO of Lotus and he made the agreement that resulted in Lotus funding Ray Ozzie&#8217;s company Iris Associates, which developed Notes.  It was a team effort, but if anyone gets the credit as inventor, it&#8217;s Ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
