<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bayosphere becomes part of Backfence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; A back fence around a ghost town</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-164000</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; A back fence around a ghost town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-164000</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A back fence around a ghost town &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-163998</link>
		<dc:creator>A back fence around a ghost town &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-163998</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t live in the areas covered by Backfence, which has 13 sites in three metropolitan areas (Washington, Chicago and the Bay Area), but I have taken a look at it from time to time because I&#8217;m interested in local citizen journalism efforts &#8212; and spent a bit of time looking at Backfence after it absorbed Dan Gillmor&#8217;s failed local CitJ experiment, Bayosphere, which I wrote about here. And it certainly never seemed like a thriving entity to me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine.net</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Collective Wisdom on the Backfence-Bayosphere Acquisition&lt;/strong&gt;

There's been a lot of interesting press today about the acquisition of Bayosphere by Backfence. (Disclosure note: Omidyar Network is a co-investor in both firms, and I serve on the board of Backfence.) It's been amazing to watch the landscape</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collective Wisdom on the Backfence-Bayosphere Acquisition</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of interesting press today about the acquisition of Bayosphere by Backfence. (Disclosure note: Omidyar Network is a co-investor in both firms, and I serve on the board of Backfence.) It&#8217;s been amazing to watch the landscape</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Richard.  I will edit the post to reflect that.

Mathew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Richard.  I will edit the post to reflect that.</p>
<p>Mathew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/17/bayosphere-becomes-part-of-backfence/#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Mitch Kapor is not the inventor of Lotus Notes.  He was the CEO of Lotus and he made the agreement that resulted in Lotus funding Ray Ozzie's company Iris Associates, which developed Notes.  It was a team effort, but if anyone gets the credit as inventor, it's Ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch Kapor is not the inventor of Lotus Notes.  He was the CEO of Lotus and he made the agreement that resulted in Lotus funding Ray Ozzie&#8217;s company Iris Associates, which developed Notes.  It was a team effort, but if anyone gets the credit as inventor, it&#8217;s Ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
