<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, this really is about work - honest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/08/257/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/08/257/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: martinhofmann.net &#187; JAlbum update</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/08/257/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>martinhofmann.net &#187; JAlbum update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/04/08/257/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>[...] I keep reading about Flickr and Bubbleshare, which are easy to use and have great blog integration. What I like about JAlbum are the features, flexibility and design options. Blog integration would be nice. The Fotoplayer skin already comes with an RSS feed, so who knows what features may get added next. I also like that I can keep the photos on my own website, and don&#8217;t have to store them on Flickr or Bubbleshare. But I can see the attraction of their services. Now if the people behind Fotoplayer and JAlbum got together and offered a hosted online version&#8230; well, just a thought. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I keep reading about Flickr and Bubbleshare, which are easy to use and have great blog integration. What I like about JAlbum are the features, flexibility and design options. Blog integration would be nice. The Fotoplayer skin already comes with an RSS feed, so who knows what features may get added next. I also like that I can keep the photos on my own website, and don&#8217;t have to store them on Flickr or Bubbleshare. But I can see the attraction of their services. Now if the people behind Fotoplayer and JAlbum got together and offered a hosted online version&#8230; well, just a thought. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
