<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting numbers are no surprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Dodge on The Next Big Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Dodge on The Next Big Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The problem with podcasts and web video&lt;/strong&gt;

Forrester reported that only 1% of on-line households in the USA use podcasts. PodTech.net disagrees...of course. I would be interested to see similar statistics for web video cast usage. My guess is that it is very low. Blog usage on the other hand is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The problem with podcasts and web video</strong></p>
<p>Forrester reported that only 1% of on-line households in the USA use podcasts. <a href="http://PodTech.net" title="http://PodTech.net" target="_blank">PodTech.net</a> disagrees&#8230;of course. I would be interested to see similar statistics for web video cast usage. My guess is that it is very low. Blog usage on the other hand is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aTypical Joe: A gay New Yorker living in the rural South</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-19213</link>
		<dc:creator>aTypical Joe: A gay New Yorker living in the rural South</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/#comment-19213</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;In the meantime, I&#039;m setting up my playlist for the drive to Macon tomorrow.  More on the Forrester report: Om Malik, Maybe we should stop calling them podcasts? Geek News Central says the numbers are wrong. Matthew Ingram saysthey&#039;re no surprise.   Posted by Joe &#124; Permalink &#124; Comments (0) &#124; TrackBack (0) &#124; eMail Joe [IMG]&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->In the meantime, I&#8217;m setting up my playlist for the drive to Macon tomorrow.  More on the Forrester report: Om Malik, Maybe we should stop calling them podcasts? Geek News Central says the numbers are wrong. Matthew Ingram saysthey&#8217;re no surprise.   Posted by Joe | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) | eMail Joe [IMG]<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans :: Main Page</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-19214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans :: Main Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/04/06/podcasting-numbers-are-no-surprise/#comment-19214</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Not surprisingly, Li&#039;s 1% &quot;solution&quot; is being savaged within the blogosphere. For some lively conversation, check out PodTech, which wonders what planet Li&#039;s living on; Scott Karp, who cautious people to be more patient, andMathew Ingram, who suggests people look down the road rather than the here and now.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Not surprisingly, Li&#8217;s 1% &#8220;solution&#8221; is being savaged within the blogosphere. For some lively conversation, check out PodTech, which wonders what planet Li&#8217;s living on; Scott Karp, who cautious people to be more patient, andMathew Ingram, who suggests people look down the road rather than the here and now.<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

