Office if necessary, not necessarily Office

by Mathew on March 9, 2006 · View Comments

What started with a rumour last night – which Om Malik (among others) wrote about – has become fact: Google has acquired Writely.com, which provides something approaching an online version of Microsoft Word. Needless to say, this has revived talk about the much-rumoured Google “Web Office,” with Web apps that take the place of the different parts of Microsoft’s Office suite – the one that accounts for a fairly substantial proportion of the software giant’s revenue and profits, in case you’re keeping score at home.

Om has a nice graph that puts the issues into perspective, with Google’s Web-based versions of Word, Excel, mail and so on — all of which Microsoft charges almost $400 for. Google’s price? Zero. My friend and fellow M-list wagon-trainer Kent Newsome doesn’t think this model will scale, but it doesn’t really have to scale all that much before it becomes a threat to Microsoft. In effect, there is nowhere for the software behemoth to go but down in terms of market share. Yes, it’s true that not everyone wants to use Web-based apps, and there are issues with the reliability of free services such as Gmail.com (which has been down several times today and yesterday).

But at the same time, Writely and JotSpot Tracker (an Excel-style spreadsheet app) and presentation tools such as Thumbstacks.com are likely to be good enough for many people, and perhaps even small businesses – and as some smart person pointed out recently (if I remember who, I will insert it here) it isn’t always the people or services that are better than you that should concern you, it’s those that are good enough to draw your customers away.

For me, having used Writely.com to plan the Web 2.0 conference I’m helping to organize in Toronto this spring, Writely is definitely good enough. And if you combine it with something like Gdrive, then the relevance of Microsoft’s Office becomes less and less compelling.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • http://evans.blogware.com Mark Evans :: Main Page

    company was bought by Google last month. It’s almost like Google has a M&A template where you all you need to do is slot in the name of the new acquisition. In any event, Writely is an interesting deal for Google because – as many others such asMathew Ingram and Paul Kedrosky will provide in more detail – it adds yet another element to Google’s strategy to compile a Web-based Office suite to compete with Microsoft. A big hat tip, by the way, to Om Malik, who had this deal nailed before anyone else. Om also

  • http://blog.exclusiveconcepts.com/archives/2006/03/weekly_roundup_21.html Exclusive Concepts’ Internet Marketing Blog

    The Coming Search Advertising Crash Will advertisers begin to lose faith in search advertising? Would you put the entire contents of your computer on Google for free? Google Drive leaked. Now thatGoogle has acquired Writely, a web-based word processor that competes with Microsoft’s Word, will that and the GDrive be enough for home users to abandon Microsoft? Get all your videos about Google – tech talks, authors and a Google factory tour from the

  • http://blog.larixconsulting.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/10/1814468.html Main Page — A View from the Isle

    could be integrated into your existing workflow and improve it, not supplant it. Since neither app is out yet, okay there might be private betas but I’m not in them, I’ll have to reserve judgment until I see them. Commentary: ZDNet: Google-WritelyMathew Ingram ZDNet:GDrive Mark Evans Red Herring Good Morning Silicon Valley Tags: Google, Writely, GMail, GTalk, GDrive, GOffice

  • http://sevendegrees.blogspot.com/2006/03/gmail-skins.html Seven Degrees

    Office if necessary, not necessarily Office » mathewingram.com/work: Om has a nice graph that puts the issues into perspective, with Google’s Web-based versions of Word, Excel, mail and so on — all of which Microsoft charges almost $400 for. Google’s price? Zero. My friend and fellow M-list wagon-trainer Kent

  • http://technews.mikewills.name Tech News Mashup

    Office if necessary, not necessarily Office — What started with a rumour last night – which Om Malik (among others) wrote about – has become fact: Google has acquired Writely.com, which provides something approaching an online version of Microsoft Word.

  • http://vittoriozambardino.blog.kataweb.it/zetavu/2006/03/esportare_la_ce.html ZetaVu

    Eppure però la blogosfera ribolle di dibattito e con una piccola scorrettezza io prendo tutti i link (in verità non sono nemmeno proprio tutti) all’argomento proposti da TechMemeorandum e li riporto qui. Buon divertimento per chi è interessato.mathewingram.com/work, Enterprise Web 2.0, Techdirt, The Ponderings of Woodrow, InsideGoogle, Search Engine Journal, theory.isthereason, Neowin.net, Download Squad, Datamation IT News Blog, B2Day, SiliconBeat, Paul Kedrosky’s …

  • http://harrisreynolds.net/blog/archives/2006/03/writeup_on_writ.html harris reynolds

    Writeup on Writely

    I had a conversation with a friend exactly six months ago to the day that went something like this: [me] Take a look at Writely… this could be BIG… zero client install… collaboration Sharepoint style, etc etc. [him] What is…

  • http://www.rickmahn.com/2006/03/09/when-is-good-enough-good-enough/ RickMahn.com » Blog Archive » When is Good Enough, Good Enough?

    [...] Potential of “Google Office”So what would Google productivity applications/services really bring to the average user? Obviously search will factor into the services greatly – and end to needing to file everything in a structured environment. You could simply “tag” each document and then search on tags and other criteria to find your documents. Gmail would fit in as a natrual piece, bringing their new chat service and upcoming Calendar services as well. Imagine including “GDrive“, as Mathew Ingram mentions, where a user could store all their online (and then some) documents, drawings, pictures, etc… Don’t forget Picasa, Google Desktop & Toolbar, Google Earth, and Blogger and you have one wide ranging powerful environment. Can Google tie all these pieces together to make a cohesive environement? How will the rumoured Google Network and Google Cube work into this? [...]

  • http://ProductArchitect.com/ Scott Lawton

    One of the most interesting views on “good enough” comes from Clayton Christensen’s Innovator’s Dilemma book (and subsequent work). Key point: as products get better and better, they often overshoot what most users need, so something that does less (and costs less) can disrupt the market leader.

  • http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060310/3039/ Things That … Make You Go Hmm

    Google Writelys a check

    Writely an online wordprocessor with some collaboration features, which we reviewed back in September 2005 has become Google’s newest acquisition.

    Jen Mazzon from the Google Writely Team explains:
    … everyone told us it was crazy to try an…

  • http://www.bitepro.com/?p=25 Tech Scene » Is this the end of Microsoft Office?

    [...] By now we’ve all heard about the rumours and confirmed blog postings on Google and Writely about the purchase.  Needless to say there are a ‘few’ posts about this throughout the blogosphere, and Memeorandum is tracking all the discussions. Mathew Ingram has a good post on his blog and is hinting that the Google model of software services is good enough for him, it still won’t suit a vast majority of consumers today.  [...]

  • http://www.jackyan.com/blog/ Jack Yan

    If it weren’t for this acquisition, I would not have known about Writely. Breaking the hold MS has with Office can only be a good thing—I have stuck with the WordPerfect Suite because I cannot figure out how to use Word. (For instance, that whole paragraph-changes-margin-and-font-thing when you hit return makes little sense to me.) If Writely is more logical, and that isn’t hard to be, then it may well get converts left, write, and centre (misspelling intended).

blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: