<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An attempt at Kent&#8217;s &#8220;second opinion&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blob &#187; LongTailJewel, SecondOpinion and NewTailBlog - Affermative Action in the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-89307</link>
		<dc:creator>Blob &#187; LongTailJewel, SecondOpinion and NewTailBlog - Affermative Action in the Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-89307</guid>
		<description>[...] Equality on the blogosphere - no gaping voids. Mike&#8217;s take on our LongTailJewels discussions Jewels i the longtail - image Pick a card, any two! &#8216;inequality kerfuffle‘ by Hugh Doc Searles giving recognition of affermative action (traction) Kent Newsome&#8217;s SecondOpinion Proposal Blobcast #5 - Horizontal HQ Sessions #2. Mike (Learndog) and Dave (Lifekludger) chat about stuff they’re thinking about. This session is about the social end of the LongTail, Ensuring every voice has at least one listener, connection, inclusion, digging for the jewels in the LongTail and how to get a discussion going in the blogosphere. Blob 6 - Horizontal HQ Sessions #3 - Pick Two Cards. Mike (Learndog) and Dave (Lifekludger) chat about stuff they’re thinking about. This session is a short one mostly explaining and expanding on a post of Mikes on the Learndog blog. We pick ‘equality and fairness’ as our two cards, talk about finding meaning not just traffic and what it takes for newcomers to get ‘traction in the blogosphere. Mathew Inram&#8217;s second opinion on me Does a Second Opinion = Affermative Traction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Equality on the blogosphere - no gaping voids. Mike&#8217;s take on our LongTailJewels discussions Jewels i the longtail - image Pick a card, any two! &#8216;inequality kerfuffle‘ by Hugh Doc Searles giving recognition of affermative action (traction) Kent Newsome&#8217;s SecondOpinion Proposal Blobcast #5 - Horizontal HQ Sessions #2. Mike (Learndog) and Dave (Lifekludger) chat about stuff they’re thinking about. This session is about the social end of the LongTail, Ensuring every voice has at least one listener, connection, inclusion, digging for the jewels in the LongTail and how to get a discussion going in the blogosphere. Blob 6 - Horizontal HQ Sessions #3 - Pick Two Cards. Mike (Learndog) and Dave (Lifekludger) chat about stuff they’re thinking about. This session is a short one mostly explaining and expanding on a post of Mikes on the Learndog blog. We pick ‘equality and fairness’ as our two cards, talk about finding meaning not just traffic and what it takes for newcomers to get ‘traction in the blogosphere. Mathew Inram&#8217;s second opinion on me Does a Second Opinion = Affermative Traction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lud</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-13581</link>
		<dc:creator>lud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-13581</guid>
		<description>Great job guys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job guys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blob</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 07:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Does a Second Opinion = Affermative Traction&lt;/strong&gt;

	After previous dialogues around the issues of gatekeepers, blog traffic, A-list, Z-list, M-list, Down-linkers and whatever else you want to term it, then Kent Newsome&#8217;s dreaming up the idea called &#8220;second opinion&#8220;, Mathew Ingram pick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does a Second Opinion = Affermative Traction</strong></p>
<p>	After previous dialogues around the issues of gatekeepers, blog traffic, A-list, Z-list, M-list, Down-linkers and whatever else you want to term it, then Kent Newsome&#8217;s dreaming up the idea called &#8220;second opinion&#8220;, Mathew Ingram pick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Universe News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting and potentially useful concept</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Universe News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting and potentially useful concept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;An attempt at Kent&#8217;s &#8220;second opinion&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;An attempt at Kent&rsquo;s &ldquo;second opinion&rdquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave the lifekludger</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave the lifekludger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mat, forgot a link to the &lt;a href="http://lifekludger.net/2006/01/18/lifekludger-vision/" rel="nofollow"&gt;vision&lt;/a&gt;. Not sure you would have got that far in your digging. BTW: In this continuous partial attention age I appreciate your taking the time to dig a bit deeper- even if it is due to being "a nosy journalist" :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mat, forgot a link to the <a href="http://lifekludger.net/2006/01/18/lifekludger-vision/" rel="nofollow">vision</a>. Not sure you would have got that far in your digging. BTW: In this continuous partial attention age I appreciate your taking the time to dig a bit deeper- even if it is due to being &#8220;a nosy journalist&#8221; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
