<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Doc &#8212; how about allowing comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Godin likes the megaphone better &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-11864</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Godin likes the megaphone better &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-11864</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 &#8212; or whatever we&#8217;re calling it nowadays &#8212; is supposed to be about the conversation, isn&#8217;t it? It&#8217;s not much of a conversation if you&#8217;re the only one talking, a point I have tried to make several times in the past, including here and here . In fact, a blog with no comments is more like a traditional media vehicle, in the sense that it&#8217;s a monologue, one that sends a subtle message that the writer has all the answers, and you the reader are simply a receptacle, a passive audience with nothing to contribute. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 &#8212; or whatever we&#8217;re calling it nowadays &#8212; is supposed to be about the conversation, isn&#8217;t it? It&#8217;s not much of a conversation if you&#8217;re the only one talking, a point I have tried to make several times in the past, including here and here . In fact, a blog with no comments is more like a traditional media vehicle, in the sense that it&#8217;s a monologue, one that sends a subtle message that the writer has all the answers, and you the reader are simply a receptacle, a passive audience with nothing to contribute. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>well said Stu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said Stu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>With the greatest respect to all, this specific A-list vs. X-list and who's the  gatekeeper? meme has to be one of the silliest series of inwardly focused navel gazing flying pixels I have ever seen. Who really gives a horseâ€™s pitooty? Say your piece, comment where you want to, join the conversation, lead the conversation, avoid the conversation. Whatever. But for heavenâ€™s sake, get over yourselves people.

Sorry, 'thew, it had to be said. I roll my eyes because I love :-)

â€“ Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the greatest respect to all, this specific A-list vs. X-list and who&#8217;s the  gatekeeper? meme has to be one of the silliest series of inwardly focused navel gazing flying pixels I have ever seen. Who really gives a horseâ€™s pitooty? Say your piece, comment where you want to, join the conversation, lead the conversation, avoid the conversation. Whatever. But for heavenâ€™s sake, get over yourselves people.</p>
<p>Sorry, &#8216;thew, it had to be said. I roll my eyes because I love :-)</p>
<p>â€“ Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Doc:

Now that Dave has chewed me out on your behalf, I feel like maybe I made things more antagonistic than I originally intended, and for that I apologize.  You are quite right that Blogger blogs are a pain to comment on, and I should have made it clear that you allow comments in a discussion forum (although I had a hard time finding it).  

For the record, I also think that your blog does a great job of highlighting links to more than just the usual gang, and you should be congratulated for that.  And I think we agree that while there are "gatekeepers" in the blogosphere, there are also a lot more ways to get around them than there are in old media.  And I think comments can go a long way toward helping achieve a flatter hierarchy.

Anyway, I apologize if I gave offence.  I was just throwing my two cents in, and spotted an opportunity to harp on my favourite topic of comments and commenting.  For what it's worth, I think you are one of the good guys  :-)

Mathew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc:</p>
<p>Now that Dave has chewed me out on your behalf, I feel like maybe I made things more antagonistic than I originally intended, and for that I apologize.  You are quite right that Blogger blogs are a pain to comment on, and I should have made it clear that you allow comments in a discussion forum (although I had a hard time finding it).  </p>
<p>For the record, I also think that your blog does a great job of highlighting links to more than just the usual gang, and you should be congratulated for that.  And I think we agree that while there are &#8220;gatekeepers&#8221; in the blogosphere, there are also a lot more ways to get around them than there are in old media.  And I think comments can go a long way toward helping achieve a flatter hierarchy.</p>
<p>Anyway, I apologize if I gave offence.  I was just throwing my two cents in, and spotted an opportunity to harp on my favourite topic of comments and commenting.  For what it&#8217;s worth, I think you are one of the good guys  :-)</p>
<p>Mathew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who&#8217;s a hypocrite now????</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Squash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who&#8217;s a hypocrite now????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/12/hey-doc-how-about-allowing-comments/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>[...] Can you spell the word &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; boys and girls? Don&#8217;t you love all these try-hard B-Listers like Squash, Matthew Ingram, Shelly Power, Scott Karp, Kent Newsome, Seth Finklestein and so on who can&#8217;t stop bleating about how nasty the A-List is. Shame on those big, old &#8216;net celebrities who only link to each other and won&#8217;t let any of these wannabes play in their reindeer games. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Can you spell the word &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; boys and girls? Don&#8217;t you love all these try-hard B-Listers like Squash, Matthew Ingram, Shelly Power, Scott Karp, Kent Newsome, Seth Finklestein and so on who can&#8217;t stop bleating about how nasty the A-List is. Shame on those big, old &#8216;net celebrities who only link to each other and won&#8217;t let any of these wannabes play in their reindeer games. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
