<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An expose on telecom bait-and-switch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Web &#8212; not democratic, but open &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-10597</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web &#8212; not democratic, but open &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-10597</guid>
		<description>[...] As I put it to Scott in a comment, however, I think the telcos are guilty of moving the goalposts, as I have mentioned before. According to a recent book called Broadband Scandal, the telcos got all kinds of favourable deals from the U.S. government a decade or so ago, in part by promising that everyone would soon have a super-fast connection capable of handling phone calls, TV-style programming and so on. Now it seems as though they are asking for the ability to charge more for delivering what should already be here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I put it to Scott in a comment, however, I think the telcos are guilty of moving the goalposts, as I have mentioned before. According to a recent book called Broadband Scandal, the telcos got all kinds of favourable deals from the U.S. government a decade or so ago, in part by promising that everyone would soon have a super-fast connection capable of handling phone calls, TV-style programming and so on. Now it seems as though they are asking for the ability to charge more for delivering what should already be here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K.</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was sort of interested as well, but the pre-release comments I&#039;ve seen all make the point that this guy was a bystander. He was neither one of the criminal telecom analysts sorts, nor was he really privy to all that much good, juicy venality. Where&#039;s the fun in reading that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was sort of interested as well, but the pre-release comments I&#8217;ve seen all make the point that this guy was a bystander. He was neither one of the criminal telecom analysts sorts, nor was he really privy to all that much good, juicy venality. Where&#8217;s the fun in reading that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] Update (2006-02-01): Mathew has uncovered more blog coverage (Gordon Cook here, Richard Stastny here, and David Isenberg here) of Kushnick&#8217;s new book, and notes the tie-in to telecom claims in the current net neutrality debate: &#8220;And it definitely sheds a different kind of light on their repeated claims that Internet content companies should be paying more for access to their pipes &#8230; It sounds to me like U.S. consumers have already paid for it several times over.&#8221; The book now has a blog here.     Related Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update (2006-02-01): Mathew has uncovered more blog coverage (Gordon Cook here, Richard Stastny here, and David Isenberg here) of Kushnick&#8217;s new book, and notes the tie-in to telecom claims in the current net neutrality debate: &#8220;And it definitely sheds a different kind of light on their repeated claims that Internet content companies should be paying more for access to their pipes &#8230; It sounds to me like U.S. consumers have already paid for it several times over.&#8221; The book now has a blog here.     Related Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/31/an-expose-on-telecom-bait-and-switch/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>But, but... they seem like such nice guys, ya know? With their suits and little phones and what not?

;-)

-- Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, but&#8230; they seem like such nice guys, ya know? With their suits and little phones and what not?</p>
<p>;-)</p>
<p>&#8211; Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
